On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:30:21PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:17 PM Alberto Bertogli
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:12:24PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alberto Bertogli
> wrote:
>> But those issues are not made worse by allowing
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 11:17 PM Alberto Bertogli
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:12:24PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alberto Bertogli
> > wrote:
> >> But those issues are not made worse by allowing golang-google-protobuf
> >> to go in, right?
> >>
> >
>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:12:24PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alberto Bertogli
wrote:
But those issues are not made worse by allowing golang-google-protobuf
to go in, right?
Let golang-google-protobuf go in is one thing, it's not difficult.
However without
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:12 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alberto Bertogli
> wrote:
> > But those issues are not made worse by allowing golang-google-protobuf
> > to go in, right?
> >
>
> Let golang-google-protobuf go in is one thing, it's not difficult.
> However
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:59 PM Alberto Bertogli
wrote:
> But those issues are not made worse by allowing golang-google-protobuf
> to go in, right?
>
Let golang-google-protobuf go in is one thing, it's not difficult.
However without golang-goprotobuf 1.4.x it's not useful currently. But
it will
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 04:43:43PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:51 PM Anthony Fok wrote:
Hi Shengjing,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi Anthony,
Thanks for writing to me! Sorry for the late reply.
I was going to re-open this with the
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:51 PM Anthony Fok wrote:
>
> Hi Shengjing,
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > Hi Anthony,
>
> Thanks for writing to me! Sorry for the late reply.
> I was going to re-open this with the pseudo header "Control: reopen
> -1" to keep this new
Hi Shengjing,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> Hi Anthony,
Thanks for writing to me! Sorry for the late reply.
I was going to re-open this with the pseudo header "Control: reopen
-1" to keep this new version out of testing (buster), but then I
decided to study the issue
Hi Anthony,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:27 PM Anthony Fok wrote:
>
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #961814 in golang-google-protobuf reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the diff of
9 matches
Mail list logo