Bug#962488: fonts-tlwg: description should explain when TTF vs. OTF is more suitable

2020-12-24 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Theppitak, Quoting Theppitak Karoonboonyanan (2020-12-24 10:49:07) > On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:51 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > fonts-tlwg are provided as both Truetype and Opentype, > > but package descriptions lack any mention of when either format is > > more suitable. > > > > Maybe

Bug#962488: fonts-tlwg: description should explain when TTF vs. OTF is more suitable

2020-12-24 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Hi Jonas, On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 12:51 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > fonts-tlwg are provided as both Truetype and Opentype, > but package descriptions lack any mention of when either format is more > suitable. > > Maybe Truetype fonts include hinting omitted from Opentype fonts. > Maybe Opentype

Bug#962488: fonts-tlwg: description should explain when TTF vs. OTF is more suitable

2020-06-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Source: fonts-tlwg Version: 1:0.7.2-1 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, fonts-tlwg are provided as both Truetype and Opentype, but package descriptions lack any mention of when either format is more suitable. Maybe Truetype fonts include hinting omitted from