Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Control: tags -1 - patch
Le lundi 22 juin 2020 à 06:08 +, Mo Zhou a écrit :
> I second that enabling openblas on armel makes basically no sense.
> If you want a BLAS implementation that is possibly slightly faster
> than
> the standard
Hi,
I second that enabling openblas on armel makes basically no sense.
If you want a BLAS implementation that is possibly slightly faster than
the standard src:lapack, please try using src:blis instead of
src:openblas on armel, since src:blis contains some generic
optimizations.
On Sun, Jun 21,
Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 à 17:28 +0300, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 02:54:22PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 à 14:40 +0300, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > Source: openblas
> > > Version: 0.3.9+ds-2
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Tags: patch
> > >
> >
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 02:54:22PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 à 14:40 +0300, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > Source: openblas
> > Version: 0.3.9+ds-2
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > A debdiff for building openblas on armel is attached.
>
>
Hi Adrian,
Le dimanche 21 juin 2020 à 14:40 +0300, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> Source: openblas
> Version: 0.3.9+ds-2
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> A debdiff for building openblas on armel is attached.
What’s the point of building openblas on armel?
Openblas is a highly optimized BLAS
Source: openblas
Version: 0.3.9+ds-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
A debdiff for building openblas on armel is attached.
diff -Nru openblas-0.3.9+ds/debian/control openblas-0.3.9+ds/debian/control
--- openblas-0.3.9+ds/debian/control2020-05-14 11:06:33.0 +
+++
6 matches
Mail list logo