Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
Le mercredi 19 août à 19h 06mn 39s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> jhcha54008, le mer. 19 août 2020 19:04:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > > My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is
On 19.08.20 19:01, jhcha54008 wrote:
> Le lundi 17 août à 00h 55mn 08s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
>>
>> ... to dicuss first whether enabling "unreleased" unconditionally will work
>> even if a port doesn't
On 8/19/20 7:08 PM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> * powerpc and ppc64 :
>
> base package powerpc-utils(1.3.7-1) has a missing dependency :
> pmac-utils
> and pmac-utils(1.1.3-27+ports) is in unreleased
Both powerpc and ppc64 are perfectly installable as pmac-utils is part
of the installation CD. I may
jhcha54008, le mer. 19 août 2020 19:04:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is happy (exactly
> > like is done for -backports).
>
> I am just curious : what are the expected benefits
> of
On 8/19/20 6:55 PM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> I think this is a misunderstanding.
>
> There is no 'unreleased' suite on install cdrom
> (and I am still unconvinced that one would be of any help there).
There are individual packages from "unrelased" on the CD image when
building a CD with debian-cd
Le lundi 17 août à 10h 17mn 24s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>
> ... I don't quite understand why "unreleased" is supposed to be part of the
> base installation. "unreleased" is not a regular package archive and all
> packages in there are usually only added temporarily.
>
> Does
Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is happy (exactly
> like is done for -backports).
>
Hi again,
I am just curious : what are the expected benefits
of an 'unreleased' distribution on install cdrom ?
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 55mn 08s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
>
> ... to dicuss first whether enabling "unreleased" unconditionally will work
> even if a port doesn't have any package in this suite.
Hi again,
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 38mn 15s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> This seems to have broken debian-installer on Debian Ports.
>
> Installing the base system now fails with:
>
> Aug 16 22:34:35 debootstrap: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --components=main
> --debian-installer
I have reverted the change for now.
But we need to discuss among various porters, I have really seen desire
for enabling the unreleased suite in ports other than the hurd port.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:28:54 +0200, a ecrit:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:17:24 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On 8/17/20 1:06 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > >> I checked the patch and it enables "unreleased" unconditionally. I'm
> > >> not sure whether that's a good
Hello Samuel!
On 8/17/20 1:06 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 00:55:08 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> and then a couple other changes, I'm waiting for the above to be merged
>>> before I can submit them.
>>
>> What happens when a port does not have any packages
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:36:43 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 8/17/20 10:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:17:24 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> "unreleased" is not a regular package archive and all
> >> packages in there are usually only
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 00:55:08 +0200, a ecrit:
> > and then a couple other changes, I'm waiting for the above to be merged
> > before I can submit them.
>
> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
My debian-cd changes create empty files so
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:17:24 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 8/17/20 1:06 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> I checked the patch and it enables "unreleased" unconditionally. I'm
> >> not sure whether that's a good idea.
> >
> > I don't think we really have a better choice: writing
Hello!
On 8/17/20 10:28 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 10:17:24 +0200, a ecrit:
>> On 8/17/20 1:06 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I checked the patch and it enables "unreleased" unconditionally. I'm
not sure whether that's a good idea.
>>>
>>> I
Hi!
On 8/17/20 12:49 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> AIUI it was only tested on the mini iso.
Well, then it should not have been merged :(.
> I noticed the issue, and worked on it, there is:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/images-team/debian-cd/-/merge_requests/7
>
> and then a couple other
Hello,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, le lun. 17 août 2020 00:38:15 +0200, a ecrit:
> This seems to have broken debian-installer on Debian Ports.
>
> Installing the base system now fails with:
>
> Aug 16 22:34:35 debootstrap: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --components=main
> --debian-installer
Hi!
This seems to have broken debian-installer on Debian Ports.
Installing the base system now fails with:
Aug 16 22:34:35 debootstrap: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --components=main
--debian-installer --resolve-deps
--include=debian-ports-archive-keyring,debian-ports-archive-keyring
19 matches
Mail list logo
