Hi Alois,
would you mind to simply push to the repository on Salsa. I need to
admit that while I like to help **a bit** with those NeuroDebian
packages the time I had to spent on it goes way beyond what I currently
can invest. So please be so kind to keep things as simple and smooth
for me.
Adrian is right. I want to make you aware of another patch set (see
attachment) which I recommend to add.
The patch is fixing an issue when importing an event file, and the
sample rate in the event file does not match the data file.
The patch set is currently maintained here
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 09:28:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
> Control: tags 922571 pending
>
> Hi,
>
> I have moved sigviewer to Debian Med team[1], fixed the other bug and
> tried to build the new upstream version 0.6.4 but failed:
>
> ...
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2
Control: tags -1 pending
Control: tags 922571 pending
Hi,
I have moved sigviewer to Debian Med team[1], fixed the other bug and
tried to build the new upstream version 0.6.4 but failed:
...
g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/sigviewer-0.6.4=.
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat
attached is a patch that fixes bug #964688 (FTBFS).
The patch corresponds to commit 93d5cec298ec6c787e45f7b3486cf47ff3461c75
in upstream.
Upgrading to sigviewer 0.6.4 would also solve this issue.
Best,
Alois
commit 93d5cec298ec6c787e45f7b3486cf47ff3461c75
Author: Alois Schloegl
Date:
5 matches
Mail list logo
