Hi Helge,
> Thanks for the explanation. It's just a pitty, it worked all the years
> (ever since I can remember, actually, basically since the 90s) until I
I cannot agree more with you than 100%, but tell this to, well, not
surprisingly, GNOME and their rework of everything, and Debian following
Hello Norbert,
On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:34:11AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > is there any chance to get my VT 1 back, i.e. this fixed before the
> > release of bullseye?
>
> From the explanations given by Simon I don't see a way how this
On Sun, 31 Jan 2021, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> is there any chance to get my VT 1 back, i.e. this fixed before the
> release of bullseye?
>From the explanations given by Simon I don't see a way how this could
work out. Sddm cannot enable getty on tty1, because this would conflict
with say gdm in
Hello sddm maintainers,
is there any chance to get my VT 1 back, i.e. this fixed before the
release of bullseye?
If you need any further information I'm available to provide those
(and test things if needed).
Thanks & Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Simon,
thanks for your ultra-fast reply!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:05:34AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 10:37:40 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > X is running on VT 7, so this is not the cause (and it does so for
> > many years already).
> ...
> > In
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 10:37:40 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> X is running on VT 7, so this is not the cause (and it does so for
> many years already).
...
> In http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/serial-console.html I read that X should
> start on VT1? Maybe systemd is no confused?
It depends
Package: general
Severity: normal
I upgraded from Debian Stable to Testing some days ago (see #964477
for some information why this was not entirely smooth). I did not
upgrade the kernel.
Now the virtual terminal 1 is no longer usuable. It only prints the
very few lines of the boot process and
7 matches
Mail list logo
