Hi Al,
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 22:08:25 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > In case you didn't notice; s390x is fixed now. The package FTBFS on
> > armhf and mips64el.
>
> Friendly ping.
Friendly ping again. We're now in the first phase of the freeze for
bullseye. It would be good, for all I guess, if
Hi Al,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:26:08 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On 24-09-2020 18:57, Al Stone wrote:
> > Yup, working on it. I may have to turn off s390x support for the
> > short term; the issue is that this package is solely little-endian
> > upstream and it has been patched and
Hi Al,
On 24-09-2020 18:57, Al Stone wrote:
> Yup, working on it. I may have to turn off s390x support for the
> short term; the issue is that this package is solely little-endian
> upstream and it has been patched and bodged so many times for
> big-endian support, it has been become
On 24 Sep 2020 11:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> ping
>
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:34:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> > This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
> > bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.
>
> acpica-unix is a key
Hi Al,
ping
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:34:14 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
> bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.
acpica-unix is a key package and will not be autoremoved. Can you please
fix the
Source: acpica-unix
Version: 20190509-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 20200528-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing
6 matches
Mail list logo
