Bug#970306: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright is a false positive when "+" is involved

2020-09-16 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Carlos, On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:21 PM Carlos Henrique Lima Melara wrote: > > I'm having a similar issue when dealing with GPL-3 or GPL-3+ License > paragraph. Do you define separate standalone License paragraphs for 'gpl-3' and 'gpl-3+'? It looks like there is only a combined standalone

Bug#970306: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright is a false positive when "+" is involved

2020-09-14 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Julien, On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 7:03 AM Julien Puydt wrote: > > I get many unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright I:-type messages > from lintian Which package are you working on, please? We cannot investigate your claim without the information. > because the paragraphs in question are

Bug#970306: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright is a false positive when "+" is involved

2020-09-14 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: lintian Version: 2.14.0 Severity: minor I get many unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright I:-type messages from lintian, because the paragraphs in question are License: foo and used as License: foo+. Lintian should see that it's compatible and accept it. I hope that helps, JP