On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:35:37PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>Thanks for the info.
>
>On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:43:33AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >Could you clarify the timing for this, especially the timeline for getting
>> >the
>> >signature from Microsoft (as far as that
Hi Steve,
Thanks for the info.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:43:33AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Could you clarify the timing for this, especially the timeline for getting
> >the
> >signature from Microsoft (as far as that can be predicted)? I'm trying to
> >assess if this could become a
Hey Ivo,
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 07:56:20PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:35:52AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>> >Hi Steve,
>> >
>> >On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> >>
Control: tags 978521 pending
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 01:35:52AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> >Hi Steve,
> >
> >On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >> During a rebuild of all packages in
Hey Ivo,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 04:26:02PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
>> on amd64.
>
>[...]
>
>> > The following packages have unmet
Hi Steve,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:39:53PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
[...]
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: shim-unsigned (=
> >
Source: shim-signed
Version: 1.33
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
