Control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/varnish/varnish-modules/commit/fed6c862118ca34374b0284a1838cc49cea5b4d1
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 07:11:11PM +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>...
> Example from the build of varnish-modules against varnish 6.5.1:
>
Paul Gevers writes:
> So, vanish stopped providing vanishabi-11.0 and vanish-modules needs
> to be fixed, otherwise vanish is not allowed to migrate to testing
> (until vanish-modules is removed from testing). vanish-modules in
> unstable is broken now, we don't want that to happen in testing.
Hi Bastian,
On 01-10-2020 10:02, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:54:05AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/v/varnish-modules/7232545/log.gz
>
> Why is a simple ABI transition now also a autopkgtest failure?
Because vanish-modules
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:54:05AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/v/varnish-modules/7232545/log.gz
Why is a simple ABI transition now also a autopkgtest failure?
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| varnish-modules : Depends:
Source: varnish-modules
Version: 0.16.0-2
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, varn...@packages.debian.org
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: needs-update
Control: affects -1 src:varnish
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of varnish the
5 matches
Mail list logo
