Control: forcemerge 967485 -1
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:09:30AM +1100, Hugh McMaster wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Hugh,
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 03:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > What is the point of moving libexif-gtk to GTK3 when the only package
> > using it does not support it?
> >
> > This
Hi Adrian,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 03:53, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> What is the point of moving libexif-gtk to GTK3 when the only package
> using it does not support it?
>
> This sounds like a mistake that should be reverted.
I already have. When I realised gtkam was an issue, I updated libexif-gtk
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:04:42PM +1100, Hugh McMaster wrote:
>...
> libexif-gtk is moving to GTK3 in response to #967573.
>
> gtkman also only supports GTK2, which means it blocks the introduction of
> libexif-gtk built on GTK3.
>...
What is the point of moving libexif-gtk to GTK3 when the
Source: gtkam
Version: 1.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: Policy 7.7
Dear Maintainer,
libexif-gtk is moving to GTK3 in response to #967573.
gtkman also only supports GTK2, which means it blocks the introduction of
libexif-gtk built on GTK3.
Upstream gtkam has seen no activity
4 matches
Mail list logo