On 10/25/20 3:04 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> I'd be more comfortable with the patch if it was at least merged on
> upstream's master branch.
Upstream isn't responding which would mean the package will remain unfixed in
Debian
for the next months and I will have to keep pinging both you and
On 2020-10-20 12:08:01, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 10/20/20 12:05 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> So, this patch and the patch from #968574 would be great!
> >
> > Has the patch from #968574 been merged upstream in the meantime?
>
> Apparently not. But merging won't break anything
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 ffmpeg: re-enable support for libsrt
On 2020-10-20 12:05:10 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 971754
>
> On 2020-10-20 11:42:47, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 +patch
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > This
On 10/20/20 12:05 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> So, this patch and the patch from #968574 would be great!
>
> Has the patch from #968574 been merged upstream in the meantime?
Apparently not. But merging won't break anything due to the #ifdef guards and
unbreaks ffmpeg
on powerpc and ppc64
Control: block -1 by 971754
On 2020-10-20 11:42:47, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +patch
>
> Hello!
>
> This FTBFS is fixed by the following upstream patch [1]:
>
> From: Jun Zhao
> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 05:48:48 + (+0800)
> Subject: lavf/srt: fix build fail when
Control: tags -1 +patch
Hello!
This FTBFS is fixed by the following upstream patch [1]:
From: Jun Zhao
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 05:48:48 + (+0800)
Subject: lavf/srt: fix build fail when used the libsrt 1.4.1
X-Git-Url:
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:4.3.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi!
ffmpeg recently started to FTBFS, most likely due to the update to src:srt:
gcc -I. -Isrc/ -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_ISOC99_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
7 matches
Mail list logo
