Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Yes, that's my view too. I had the patch queued in dpkg for my next
> > push, but I've pulled it out for now given the raised concern, but
> > I'm not seeing a very strong case here to not include it again TBH.
>
> Ok, I'm doing this now and will reinstate the patch into t
Hi!
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 02:33:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:15:03 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > Adding more hurdles does not help.
> > > I think this is a hurdle we do not need.
> >
> > To me, a one-line change in packaging seems like a quite small hurdle in
On Sat, 2020-11-14 at 11:15:03 -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2020-11-14, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Unfortunately, only like 10% of the relevant packages have test suites
> > enabled and run, because gettings things to work reliable is sometimes
> > hard.
> So, based on your estimate and the c
On 2020-11-14, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2020-11-13, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> If it could be fixed at the core for QFINDTESTDATA, that would be nicer
>> than fixing 20-30 packages individually, though we're not there right
>> now.
>
> Unfortunately, only like 10% of the relevant packages have te
4 matches
Mail list logo
