On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>...
> 4) Provide OpenJDK 17 in bullseye-backports only. I don't know
>how it can land there.
>...
My suggestion for that is in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/02/msg00031.html
If this suggesion is not acceptable,
Am Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> On 12/2/20 5:42 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:40:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the upload.
> >> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
> >> still
> >>
On 1/26/21 6:53 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
> still
> >>> ping, has there been
On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
:) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
still
>>> ping, has there been any progress on this?
>> chatting with Moritz from the security team, we
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
> >> still
> > ping, has there been any progress on this?
> chatting with Moritz from the security team, we found four options:
> 1) Ship a snapshot of
On 12/2/20 5:42 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 08:40:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>>> Thanks for the upload.
>> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is
>> still
>> open...
>
> ping, has there been any progress on this?
chatting with
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 07:47:14PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > I think nobody wants to switch default-jdk to 17 or even not ship
> > 11 at all any more or stop supporting it during bullseye’s lifetime.
> > Maybe that also
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I think nobody wants to switch default-jdk to 17 or even not ship
> 11 at all any more or stop supporting it during bullseye’s lifetime.
> Maybe that also was too implicit?
Exactly, the supported Java release for the entire
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11/18/20 8:03 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > New OpenJDK versions tend to cause both buildtime and runtime breakages
> > in reverse dependencies, some of them hard to resolve and requiring
> > updates to new upstream versions which in turn require new
10 matches
Mail list logo
