Hello Simon, and anyone else reading:
Quick progress update for anyone reading this thread: I've updated my
fork to 1.8.6, it builds, and CI passes. That said, I'm not 100%
positive that I didn't miss something when repacking the source. Git
diff --stat didn't reveal anything obvious. I didn't
Hi Félix,
Félix Sipma writes:
> Hi,
>
> Having a backport of syncthing would be great, but unfortunately I
> won't have a lot time to invest in it: a baby, a farm and involvement
> in other non-profit organisations do not let me as much time as I would
> like for Debian, sorry!
>
> Have a
On 31/01/2022 03:04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hi Félix and Aloïs,
Aloïs Micard writes:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:44 +0100 =?utf-8?B?RsOpbGl4?= Sipma
wrote:
Version 1.18.0 has been uploaded on testing, I will take a look
at the amount of work needed for a bullseye-backport, but I'm pretty
Hi,
Having a backport of syncthing would be great, but unfortunately I
won't have a lot time to invest in it: a baby, a farm and involvement
in other non-profit organisations do not let me as much time as I would
like for Debian, sorry!
Have a nice day,
--
Félix
signature.asc
Hi Félix and Aloïs,
Aloïs Micard writes:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:44 +0100 =?utf-8?B?RsOpbGl4?= Sipma
> wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice to have a backport of syncthing. In particular, recent
>> versions contain several db optimisations.
>>
I didn't know about these db optimisations, but
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:10:44 +0100 =?utf-8?B?RsOpbGl4?= Sipma
wrote:
Package: syncthing
Version: 1.10.0~ds1-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have a backport of syncthing. In particular, recent
versions contain several db optimisations.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: syncthing
Version: 1.10.0~ds1-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have a backport of syncthing. In particular, recent
versions contain several db optimisations.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500,
7 matches
Mail list logo
