Holger Levsen wrote:
> maybe this can be solved by having two (or three) diffoscope packages:
One thing I would like to ensure that we do not cause a reduction in
functionality for some extremely prevalent use-cases.
I'm not just thinking of end-users here: in fact, I am thinking of
various
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:45:43AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > - diffoscope-full with the packages as recommends
> I reckon this "type" should stay named "diffoscope", what it currently
> is. So current users still get what they currently get.
agreed, that's better.
--
cheers,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:31:55AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:35:11PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> > I have managed to figure out that by moving the following Recommends to
> > Suggests one can cut the footprint from 2.6GB to about 64MB which is much
> > more
> >
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 06:35:11PM +, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I have managed to figure out that by moving the following Recommends to
> Suggests one can cut the footprint from 2.6GB to about 64MB which is much more
> reasonable. Therefore please do that. These are ordered roughly by size:
maybe
Package: diffoscope
Version: 161
Severity: important
File: diffoscope
Dear Maintainer,
The size of diffoscope is getting really quite ridiculous, all the recommends
now come to ~2.6 GB installed size, even though they are not used in the vast
majority of use cases. Not only is the disk space
5 matches
Mail list logo
