Hello,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:13:07 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On 2020-12-08 23:04:05 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Hello again
> >
> > polybar is now ok
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2020-12-08 23:04:05 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello again
>
> polybar is now ok too, because of the xcb-proto fix
>
> remaining failures are down to 4, only one wit
Hello again
polybar is now ok too, because of the xcb-proto fix
remaining failures are down to 4, only one without patch and one out from
testing.
kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297)
libseqlib fail (#976414) forwarded upstream that might be easily
patchable
spring
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:33:47 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> After having a look at the failures,
> two of them are gone with new d-shlibs
>
> Remaining are failing for unrelated stuff, or have patches:
>
> kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297)
> polybar fail (un
After having a look at the failures,
two of them are gone with new d-shlibs
Remaining are failing for unrelated stuff, or have patches:
kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297)
polybar fail (unrelated: #975795)
libseqlib fail (#976414) forwarded upstream tha
Of the 44 involved packages, 34 of them are binNMU ok, rebuilds were fine.
Of the remaining 10, 1 is an unrelated FTBFS, one is trivially fixable and the
other are ongoing.
I'll open bugs with patches in the next few days.
G.
cmake ok
bamtoolsok
chromium
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Hello, I would like to finally do this libjsoncpp transition before freeze.
The version in sid has lots of bugs, and its really outdated.
We have ~30 reverse-dependencies, last time I ch
7 matches
Mail list logo