Bug#977922: iproute2 should probably only Suggest libatm1

2020-12-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: close -1 On Sat, 2020-12-26 at 01:31 -0500, nick black wrote: > > The PR downgrades also the dependency on libxtables, which is > > definitely not something we want. And even for libatm1, what is the > > issue exactly? It's just one library, why is it a problem

Bug#977922: iproute2 should probably only Suggest libatm1

2020-12-25 Thread nick black
> The PR downgrades also the dependency on libxtables, which is > definitely not something we want. And even for libatm1, what is the > issue exactly? It's just one library, why is it a problem if, with > recommends enabled, it gets installed? > TC loses functionality without it. the only loss is

Bug#977922: iproute2 should probably only Suggest libatm1

2020-12-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 22:21, Nick Black (Public gmail account) wrote: > > Package: iproute2 > Version: 5.10.0-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: dankamong...@gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > > [ A patch has been provided for this bug at >

Bug#977922: iproute2 should probably only Suggest libatm1

2020-12-22 Thread Nick Black (Public gmail account)
Package: iproute2 Version: 5.10.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: dankamong...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, [ A patch has been provided for this bug at https://salsa.debian.org/debian/iproute2/-/merge_requests/4 ] Recommends "should list packages that would be found together with