On Tuesday, January 19, 2021 4:24:20 AM EST you wrote:
> It seems your proposal does not allow to set CC to clang ?
You're right, I made a mistake in the 'else' part. This is what it should be:
ifeq ($(origin CC),default)
CC := `which $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)-gcc`
else
CC := `which $(CC)`
endif
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 08:15:10PM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> On Monday, January 18, 2021 9:56:58 AM EST you wrote:
> > Could you check whether this is compatible with your build process?
> Setting the CC variable works, and although the cross built pari-gp binary is
> not identical to the native
On Monday, January 18, 2021 9:56:58 AM EST you wrote:
> Could you check whether this is compatible with your build process?
Setting the CC variable works, and although the cross built pari-gp binary is
not identical to the native built one in my run, they differ only in the build
ID. So
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:43:15AM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> On Monday, January 11, 2021 7:55:30 AM EST Bill Allombert wrote:
> > The problem with your proposal is that the resulting cross pari.cfg might
> > not actually work in a non-cross environment (mainly the package pari-gp2c).
> > For
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:33:18PM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> Here's a new patch. It's the same as before, but with sed to modify the
> config
> files appropriately. I'd have smashed the sed commands together if not for
> readability, and for the text alignment being so nice as-is
Did you
Here's a new patch. It's the same as before, but with sed to modify the config
files appropriately. I'd have smashed the sed commands together if not for
readability, and for the text alignment being so nice as-is --- pari-2.13.0.orig/debian/rules 2020-10-22 11:41:11.0 -0400
+++
On Monday, January 11, 2021 7:55:30 AM EST Bill Allombert wrote:
> The problem with your proposal is that the resulting cross pari.cfg might
> not actually work in a non-cross environment (mainly the package pari-gp2c).
> For example the package produced with the clang rebuild would not work on
>
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 08:15:36PM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> On Thursday, January 7, 2021 11:54:19 AM EST Bill Allombert wrote:
> > The issue is that using $(CC) breaks reproducible build due to pari.cfg.
> Are you referring to building Debian binary packages reproducibly as in [1]?
> I don't
On Thursday, January 7, 2021 11:54:19 AM EST Bill Allombert wrote:
> The issue is that using $(CC) breaks reproducible build due to pari.cfg.
Are you referring to building Debian binary packages reproducibly as in [1]?
I don't understand the connection. I see that the C compiler, architecture,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:37:56AM -0500, John Scott wrote:
> Source: pari
> Version: 2.13.0-2
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftcbfs
>
> PARI fails to cross build due to using 'cc' as the C compiler:
> http://crossqa.debian.net/src/pari
> With
Source: pari
Version: 2.13.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
PARI fails to cross build due to using 'cc' as the C compiler:
http://crossqa.debian.net/src/pari
With the attached patch, PARI successfully builds and the cross tests (by way
of
11 matches
Mail list logo
