Bug#979966: debdelta still contains isAlive()s

2021-01-19 Thread A Mennucc1
dear all, I just uploaded a 0.66 *before* reading this message when I checked 0.65+nmu it seemed it was fine in this respect before creating 0.66, I did # grep -e isAlive -r . and I did not see any occurrence so hopefully it will be OK a. Il 18/01/21 18:59, Calum McConnell ha scritto: > On

Bug#979966: debdelta still contains isAlive()s

2021-01-19 Thread A Mennucc1
dear all, I just uploaded a 0.66 *before* reading this message when I checked 0.65+nmu it seemed it was fine in this respect before creating 0.66, I did # grep -e isAlive -r . and I did not see any occurrence so hopefully it will be OK a. Il 18/01/21 18:59, Calum McConnell ha scritto: > On

Bug#979966: debdelta still contains isAlive()s

2021-01-18 Thread Calum McConnell
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 14:41 +0100, Steven De Herdt wrote: > reopen 979966 > thanks > > This report actually concerns 0.65+nmu1: /usr/bin/debdelta is identical > to the one in 0.65.  Something must have gone wrong in the NMU... > > Thanks for the work on this package! > -Steven I can confirm

Bug#979966: debdelta still contains isAlive()s

2021-01-18 Thread Steven De Herdt
reopen 979966 thanks This report actually concerns 0.65+nmu1: /usr/bin/debdelta is identical to the one in 0.65. Something must have gone wrong in the NMU... Thanks for the work on this package! -Steven