Bug#980217: ipp-usb: should this be Multi-Arch: foreign?

2021-02-19 Thread Alexander Pevzner
Hi Didier, I don't know how to correctly explain it in terms of Debian packaging rules, but conceptually, yes, ipp-usb:i386 should be satisfied by ipp-usb:amd64 and visa versa. I'll Cc: this conversation to Zdenek, because the same idea may be applied to Fedora packaging too. And

Bug#980217: ipp-usb: should this be Multi-Arch: foreign?

2021-02-19 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hello Alexander, As ipp-usb author; do you have an opinion/advice about this? Many thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX Le samedi, 16 janvier 2021, 12.19:15 h CET Simon McVittie a écrit : > Package: ipp-usb > Version: 0.9.16-1 > Severity: minor > > A recent update to wine32:i386 on my

Bug#980217: ipp-usb: should this be Multi-Arch: foreign?

2021-01-16 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: ipp-usb Version: 0.9.16-1 Severity: minor A recent update to wine32:i386 on my amd64 system pulled in libsane1:i386, which Recommends ipp-usb. Because ipp-usb is Multi-Arch: no, apt interprets this as wanting to install ipp-usb:i386, which conflicts with ipp-usb:amd64. ipp-usb seems to