On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 18:49 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I've added a few extra Depends to make sure everything is really
> updated in lockstep and tested with unattended-upgrades: the result
> was much better this time!
...
> I believe we can merge the MR and consider the issue resolved.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 04:36:21PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I've opened
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/merge_requests/98
>
> with the proposed patch, and I'm going to use the information you
> provided above to give it some testing now.
I've added a few extra
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:04:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 15:34 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > As I've never used unattended-upgrades myself, I'm not familiar with
> > it. Is there any chance you could provide some quick tips on how to
> > set up a reproducer
On Sun, 2021-01-31 at 15:34 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> As I've never used unattended-upgrades myself, I'm not familiar with
> it. Is there any chance you could provide some quick tips on how to
> set up a reproducer environment? Specifically how to set up the same
> upgrade strategy you're
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 05:43:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Source: libvirt
> Version: 7.0.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There is some sort of missing dependency that means that the daemon is
> stopped during certain kinds of upgrades. I use unattended-upgrades in
> the minimal-steps mode rather
Source: libvirt
Version: 7.0.0-1
Severity: serious
There is some sort of missing dependency that means that the daemon is
stopped during certain kinds of upgrades. I use unattended-upgrades in
the minimal-steps mode rather than upgrading all packages at once. As a
result the order of upgrades
6 matches
Mail list logo
