Package: neomutt
Followup-For: Bug #981594
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
OpenSSL is now also licensed under the Apache license, and GnuTLS
does not support Let's encrypt certificates as used on gmane.io,
complaining about the expired DST Root CA X3.
OpenSSL supports this Let's encrypt root CA cha
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Stefan wrote:
What about a neomutt-openssl binary package?
IMHO there would have to be a strong compelling reason to have *both*
in the archive, to overcome the drawbacks of having both: much more
complex packaging, more user confusion about which to in
In Debian's XMPP I have asked this question. Feedback: There are
applications which have better support of OpenSSL and others with better
support of GnuTLS. We should check the status with the upstream
project.
I asked the upstream project about OpenSSL and GnuTLS:
They *should* work identically.
Package: neomutt
Version: 20201127+dfsg.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Please link against OpenSSL. OpenSSL is considered as a system library
so there should no license restriction, see #924937.
I started to rebuild against OpenSSL almost a year a ago and I didn't
any downside. It connects quicker but I d
4 matches
Mail list logo
