Bug#981621: RFS: filezilla/3.52.2+dfsg-3 [Team] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client

2021-02-02 Thread Philip Wyett
On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 10:53 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello Philip, > > while we like to remove non-free stuff from our tarballs, I don't > think removing dlls is a good use case. > > Using the upstream tarball is quite convenient, since we have less > importing errors, the md5 is

Bug#981621: RFS: filezilla/3.52.2+dfsg-3 [Team] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client

2021-02-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello Philip, while we like to remove non-free stuff from our tarballs, I don't think removing dlls is a good use case. Using the upstream tarball is quite convenient, since we have less importing errors, the md5 is the same and can be verified, and we don't introduce patches that last

Bug#981621: RFS: filezilla/3.52.2+dfsg-3 [Team] -- Full-featured graphical FTP/FTPS/SFTP client

2021-02-02 Thread Philip Wyett
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "filezilla": * Package name: filezilla Version : 3.52.2+dfsg-3 Upstream Author : Tim Kosse * URL : https://filezilla-project.org/ * License : MIT,