Hello Craig,
I updated the package to package in the debian repository to 4.9.2-1
and it is now building (gdb buildpackage). As soon as this is
completed, I put it up on my webspace so you can obtain it either from
the salsa repository or from my webspace.
If you feel that we should rather use
Am Mi., 10. Feb. 2021 um 16:52 Uhr schrieb Helge Kreutzmann
:
>
> Hello Mario,
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:53:14PM +0100, Mario Blättermann wrote:
> > to mention that Craig just released procps-ng-3.3.17 which also ships
> > translated man pages. To avoid file conflicts, I've fixed the procps
> >
Hello Mario,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:53:14PM +0100, Mario Blättermann wrote:
> to mention that Craig just released procps-ng-3.3.17 which also ships
> translated man pages. To avoid file conflicts, I've fixed the procps
> .po files in manpages-l10n in a way that the man pages don't get built
>
Hello,
to mention that Craig just released procps-ng-3.3.17 which also ships
translated man pages. To avoid file conflicts, I've fixed the procps
.po files in manpages-l10n in a way that the man pages don't get built
anymore, except for Buster (for possible backports). Then I've
released v4.9.2
Hello Craig,
thank you very much for your support. I was tired and frustrated
yesterday.
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:34:19PM -0500, Craig Small wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> The first problem I can see is you haven't pushed the git tags. Salsa
> doesn't know about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
The first problem I can see is you haven't pushed the git tags. Salsa
doesn't know about the 4.9.1 update[1]
git push --tags should do it
So it fails to build for me here
$ gbp buildpackage --git-pbuilder
gbp:info: Building with (cowbuilder)
Hello Craig,
I updated the packge but now this gdb-thingy (sorry) is on strike and I
have now idea why:
helge@samd:/tmp/debian-manpages-l10n$ LC=ALL=C gbp buildpackage
gbp:info: Performing the build
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui -i -I
dpkg-buildpackage: Information: Quellpaket manpages-l10n
…
Hello Craig,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:54:54AM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 05:16, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote:
> > > I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from
> > > psmisc and
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 05:16, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote:
> > I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from
> > psmisc and manpages-de there.
> >
> > Breaks: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1), psmisc (<< 23.4-2)
> >
Hello Craig,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote:
> I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from
> psmisc and manpages-de there.
>
> Breaks: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1), psmisc (<< 23.4-2)
> Replaces: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1)
This is correct, it
Hi,
installing manpages-de from Helge's tarball (see [1])...
dileks@iniza:~/src/manpages-l10n/current$ sudo dpkg -i
manpages-de_4.9.1-1_all.deb
..let's me coexist psmisc with manpages-de:
-ii manpages-de 4.2.0-1
+ii manpages-de 4.9.1-1
+ii psmisc 23.4-2
Thanks to all involved people.
Hi,
I hit the same problem as Axel B. reported.
# RELEASE="buildd-unstable" ; LC_ALL=C apt-get dist-upgrade -V -t $RELEASE
...
The following packages will be REMOVED:
manpages-de (4.2.0-1)
task-german (3.63)
The following packages will be upgraded:
psmisc (23.3-1 => 23.4-2)
1 upgraded, 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from
psmisc and manpages-de there.
Breaks: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1), psmisc (<< 23.4-2)
Replaces: manpages-de (<= 2.16-1)
Think of Breaks as "someone won't have the manpage or
tags 982059 + pending
thanks
Hello Craig,
the manpage-l10n package is ready to go. You can either pick it up
from git https://salsa.debian.org/debian/manpages-l10n.git and perfom
"gbp buildpackage" or you can download the packages "ready to sign and
upload" from my site:
Hello,
> > 23.4-2, which I will have to update with these control lines, will have:
> > Breaks: manpages-de (<< 4.9.1-1)
> > Replaces: manpages-de (<< 4.9.1-1)
>
> > Does that seem to make sense to everyone?
>
> Although it appears a little counter-intuitive, according to
>
Hello Craig,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:06:26PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> It's not the entire package, just the specific man pages that are carried
> by the program package. So the de fuser.1 will still exist, just in psmisc
> not manpages-de. The benefit is that the psmisc po4a will update
Hi Helge,
It's not the entire package, just the specific man pages that are carried
by the program package. So the de fuser.1 will still exist, just in psmisc
not manpages-de. The benefit is that the psmisc po4a will update the man
page every time the main man page is updated so they stay in
Hello all,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 09:40:46AM +0100, Mario Blättermann wrote:
> Of course, I knew about the raised file conflicts. Yesterday we have
> released manpages-l10n v4.9.1 [1], without the psmisc translations.
This version is ready to go, I only need to run git commit.
However, as
Hello all,
our project manpages-l10n is actually the second best solution to
provide translated man pages. The files are always somewhat older than
the original ones, because we download distribution packages, extract
the man pages, translate the contents and release a new version every
three
Yep, psmisc now ships with translated packages. So fuser.1 and friends are
in two places.
So manpages-de has fuser, killall, peekfd, pslog and pstree but not prstat.
There is also manpages-nl and manpages-pl but neither of those languages
are in psmisc. psmisc has ft, pt_BR, ru and uk and the
Package: manpages-de,psmisc
Severity: serious
Version: manpages-de/4.2.0-1
Version: psmisc/23.4-1
Hi,
there seems a new file conflict between manpages-de (uploaded in
December) and the most recent psmisc upload:
As I first run into it:
Unpacking psmisc (23.4-1) over (23.3-1) ...
dpkg: error
21 matches
Mail list logo
