fixed 997210 1:3.0.1
done 982848 1:3.0.1
thanks
Hi Vincent!
On 9/30/21 18:03, Vincent Smeets wrote:
> Hello Adrian, (I'm not sure that my first mail did reach all needed
> recipients, so here again)
It did. Sorry, I'm currently on vacation which I was not so busy the
past days.
> Yes, I am interested in you being the sponsor of my package.
Hello Adrian, (I'm not sure that my first mail did reach all needed
recipients, so here again)
Yes, I am interested in you being the sponsor of my package. Does it need
to be recorded somewhere (e.g. on mentors.debian.net or in d/control) or is
it just information for me?
Can you forward the
Hello Vincent!
> It is suggested to use a native package structure to package binutils
> for a less common target. The way this package should be packaged is
> described in https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingLessCommonBinutilsTargets
>
> Please update the packaging to follow the above
Package: binutils-m68hc1x
Version: 1:2.35.1-3
Severity: wishlist
It is suggested to use a native package structure to package binutils
for a less common target. The way this package should be packaged is
described in https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingLessCommonBinutilsTargets
Please update the
5 matches
Mail list logo
