Bug#983597: [PATCH] Segfault in libqt5quick5.so: QQuickItemLayer::~QQuickItemLayer()

2021-03-05 Thread Dennis Filder
Control: tag -1 - patch On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:17:24PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Did you actually check that it fixes the problem for you? No, I included the patch more as a hint to the nature of the bug, not as a fix, but I should have stated that more clearly. Regards, Dennis.

Bug#983597: [PATCH] Segfault in libqt5quick5.so: QQuickItemLayer::~QQuickItemLayer()

2021-03-05 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tags -1 -patch Hi Pino! On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 07:17:24PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > Did you actually check that it fixes the problem for you? > The thing is, in C++ (at least since C++98) the delete operator is > defined to be a no-op for a null pointer, much like free() in C. >

Bug#983597: [PATCH] Segfault in libqt5quick5.so: QQuickItemLayer::~QQuickItemLayer()

2021-03-05 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi Dennis, In data venerdì 26 febbraio 2021 22:48:43 CET, Dennis Filder ha scritto: > If you decide to use the attached patch, please put the bugnumber in > the Bug-Debian: field for me. The patch you provided is the following: ---

Bug#983597: [PATCH] Segfault in libqt5quick5.so: QQuickItemLayer::~QQuickItemLayer()

2021-02-27 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-91437 Hi Dennis! On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:48:43PM +0100, Dennis Filder wrote: > The segfault happens > * both with and without a preexisting configuration, > * only if Orca is running in the same session. Without Orca the >

Bug#983597: [PATCH] Segfault in libqt5quick5.so: QQuickItemLayer::~QQuickItemLayer()

2021-02-26 Thread Dennis Filder
Package: libqt5quick5 Version: 5.15.2+dfsg-4 Architecture: amd64 Severity: normal Tags: sid bullseye a11y upstream patch confirmed Control: affects -1 + linphone-desktop The segfault happens * both with and without a preexisting configuration, * only if Orca is running in the same session.