Control: tag 985054 + pending
Andreas Beckmann writes:
> That's something I haven't come across so far ;-) (Conditional usage
> of /usr/share/doc content in postinst, unconditional usage of the
> generated side effect in postrm purge.)
> Please move the bits needed by the package out of
On 21/03/2021 18.59, wf...@niif.hu wrote:
wf...@niif.hu writes:
Andreas Beckmann writes:
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential packages are available for sure.
I can't see coturn rely on any of its dependencies during
wf...@niif.hu writes:
> Andreas Beckmann writes:
>
>> According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
>> during purge, only the essential packages are available for sure.
>
> I can't see coturn rely on any of its dependencies during purge, do you?
Hi Andreas,
Have you
Andreas Beckmann writes:
> According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
> during purge, only the essential packages are available for sure.
Hi Andreas,
I can't see coturn rely on any of its dependencies during purge, do you?
> (this was observed in a piuparts nodocs
Package: coturn
Version: 4.5.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
According to policy 7.2 you cannot rely on the depends being available
during purge, only the essential packages are
5 matches
Mail list logo
