OK Paul, I think that makes perfect sense, I will close this ticket.
Thanks
David
On 8/4/21 5:21 pm, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 08-04-2021 03:11, David Bannon wrote:
>> The relevant part of the Lazarus Source was updated on the 6th April.
>> And, sadly in such a way that its no lon
Hi David,
On 08-04-2021 03:11, David Bannon wrote:
> The relevant part of the Lazarus Source was updated on the 6th April.
> And, sadly in such a way that its no longer usable with the existing
> library, such as the one in Bullseye.
It's true for a lot of packages in Debian that if you mix Debi
Thanks for your response Paul.
On 8/4/21 5:06 am, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> AFAIK libqt5pas is build from lazarus source. The lazarus source and
> libqt5pas are in sync last time I checked.
The relevant part of the Lazarus Source was updated on the 6th April.
And, sadly in such a way that its no l
Hi,
On 07-04-2021 03:32, David Bannon wrote:
> The current version of libqt5pas is 1.2.9, or, perhaps, I should say the
> current version of libqt5pas1 is 2.9 ?
AFAIK libqt5pas is build from lazarus source. The lazarus source and
libqt5pas are in sync last time I checked. We're in the bullseye fr
Package: libqt5pas1
Version: 2.6+2.0.8+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: tomboy...@bannons.id.au
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
The current version of libqt5pas is 1.2.9, or, perhaps, I should say the
current version of libqt5pas1 is 2.9 ?
>From time t
5 matches
Mail list logo
