Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 09:19:48PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > No. The majority of packages r-cran-* packages has "real" tests that > > are manually crafted in addition to autopkgtest-pkg-r. > > Great. Loving it. :-) > > I think that's OK since as I said most of the packages have

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Andreas, On 15-04-2021 21:13, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:32:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> We are working on it makeing them non-superficial. Its the case for >>> r-bioc-* currently[1] and the plan is to do this for all R packages. >> >> Aha, so non r-bioc-*

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:32:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > We are working on it makeing them non-superficial. Its the case for > > r-bioc-* currently[1] and the plan is to do this for all R packages. > > Aha, so non r-bioc-* packages are superficial at this moment. Not really.

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-09 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Andreas, On 09-04-2021 10:50, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:02:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial. >> >> That's an interesting point. Should they (they're not)?

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:02:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial. > > That's an interesting point. Should they (they're not)? Maybe with R > packages autopkgtest-pkg-r may or

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Andreas, On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial. That's an interesting point. Should they (they're not)? Maybe with R packages autopkgtest-pkg-r may or may not be very extensive? If that's true, than it's currently

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Sebastian, On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 05:47:04PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > unblock r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6 > > This package will need another: > > Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by tille, a new source-only > upload is needed to allow migration Aaaargh,

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

2021-04-08 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: 986...@bugs.debian.org Please unblock package r-cran-rcdklibs [ Reason ] Fixing bug #986467. [ Impact ] The package would be unusable due to a missing Dependency. [ Tests ]