Bug#987641: Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

2021-05-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Theodore Y. Ts'o (2021-05-20): > The real world corner cases are if you are using a 32-bit arm binary > on a 64-bit binary, and if you are using a sparc64 system (not an > officially supported Debian arch). I'm not sure if misaligned pointer > accesses are allowed in arm-32 kernel code, but it's

Bug#987641: Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

2021-05-20 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:55:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Paul Gevers (2021-05-20): > > On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due > > to the current high volume to our list, this fell from the radar. To >

Bug#987641: Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

2021-05-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Ted, Paul Gevers (2021-05-20): > On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > > Ping to the debian-release bug. > > Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due > to the current high volume to our list, this fell from the radar. To > avoid this I now generate a