Hi,
Paul Gevers (2021-05-25):
> I trust you to handle that in a sane way, so, unless you find "heated"
> discussions in an unblock bug (than please check with the Release Team
> member(s) involved), please go ahead.
Alright, thanks. :) Yes, “when in doubt, ask” is quite a well known move
of mine
Hi kibi,
On 25-05-2021 01:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Paul Gevers (2021-05-24):
>> unblocked and aged to 10 days. @kibi, let me know if you need it earlier.
>
> Thanks for the unblock. Do you prefer handling the aging yourself, or
> can I just adjust with either age-days or urgent if I see stuf
Hi,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2021-05-24):
> Dear Release Team and Paul,
>
> I am hopeful that this recent upload of open-iscsi at version 2.1.3-5
> is proper. I request an unblock of this version so that the d-i issue
> is fixed.
>
> The patch was prepared in close co-ordination with Cyril from d-i t
Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-5
Dear Release Team and Paul,
I am hopeful that this recent upload of open-iscsi at version 2.1.3-5
is proper. I request an unblock of this version so that the d-i issue
is fixed.
The patch was prepared in close co-ordination with Cyril from d-i tea
Hi Ritesh,
On 12-05-2021 18:27, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The package has been uploaded to Unstable. It has built proper on all
> supported architectures. You may want to consider unblocking this build
> revision.
The armhf udeb package has an unmet dependency.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descrip
On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 22:04 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > That's not what I meant. I'll try to be more clear next time.
> >
> > You're debdiff showed only the content of the open-iscsi binary
> > package
> > (which wasn't affected by your changes). My request was intended
> > for
> > *all* b
Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-4
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 22:00 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30-04-2021 17:03, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I will go ahead with the upload now and will untag this bug report
> > of
> > `moreinfo`.
>
> That's not what I meant. I'
Hi,
On 30-04-2021 17:03, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I will go ahead with the upload now and will untag this bug report of
> `moreinfo`.
That's not what I meant. I'll try to be more clear next time.
You're debdiff showed only the content of the open-iscsi binary package
(which wasn't affected by
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo +help
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 21:02 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 20:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > > The interim workaround is to ship the library i
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 20:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > The interim workaround is to ship the library into the open-
> > > iscsi-
> > udeb
> > > package itself.
> >
> > This looks acceptable, but could you
On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > The interim workaround is to ship the library into the open-iscsi-
> udeb
> > package itself.
>
> This looks acceptable, but could you please add a binary debdiff to
> this
> report to show the effect of the changes?
I guess I used the too
Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i
Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-3
Hi Ritesh,
On 29-04-2021 10:23, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The open-iscsi-udeb package is not installable in the d-i environment
> because of the unavailable respective udeb package for libopeniscsiusr.
Ouch. If I unde
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package open-iscsi
[ Reason ]
With version 2.1.x of open-iscsi, a new library was introduced;
libopeniscsiusr. Since we ship a udeb variant of the open-iscsi package,
this li
13 matches
Mail list logo
