"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> I'm not hugely happy that this has ended up not being in stretch, to
> be quite honest.
Agreed. I was pushing for it in vain, unfortunately.
> We're in the process of organising the final point release for buster,
> as support for it moves over to the LTS team, so
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 22:09 +0200, wf...@niif.hu wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:17:26 +0200 wf...@niif.hu wrote:
>
> > Andreas kindly provided further refinements for his patch in
> > #985173.
> > I'll update this stable update request with the new debdiff
> >
On Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:17:26 +0200 wf...@niif.hu wrote:
> Andreas kindly provided further refinements for his patch in #985173.
> I'll update this stable update request with the new debdiff shortly.
Here it is:
$ debdiff pacemaker_2.0.1-5+deb10u1.dsc pacemaker_2.0.1-5+deb10u2.dsc
diff -Nru
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Stable Release Team,
The latest stretch security upgrade broke the upgrade path to buster.
Since fixing that in stretch didn't get any traction (#981088), we have
to fix this
4 matches
Mail list logo
