Hi kibi,
On 24-05-2021 06:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Nothing dramatic, we'll be more explicit next time and pick an option
> for real instead of considering both options and letting one pick a
> favorite. :)
Let's agree on that indeed. It's a shame that we get into these
annoyances, while all
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers (2021-05-20):
> On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in
> > the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice…
>
> I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb
Hi Cyril
On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in
> the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice…
I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb generating
packages recently on IRC
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno (2021-05-18):
> [ Risks ]
> The fixes related to the testsuite involves many changes to our build
> system, by letting the upstream makefiles to install the ld.so symlink
> instead of doing it in the Debian makefiles, in an architecture specific
> way for bi/tri-arch packages.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package glibc
[ Reason ]
This new version fixes testsuite failures when run on a kernel which has
5 matches
Mail list logo
