Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 6:02 PM Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Having an S-V field makes it possible for maintainers
Enabling people is great! My remark was imprecise: I merely wish the
field were optional once again, and not required.
Lintian would drop the warning right away.
Kind regards
Hello Felix,
On Fri 21 May 2021 at 04:04AM -07, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On a side note, I am personally not convinced that a declaration of
> the Standards-Version solves more problems than it creates. For most
> packages, it is perpetually out of date, and Lintian's other packaging
> hints are
Hi Philip,
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:24 AM Philip Hands wrote:
>
> Running lintian from bullseye on udebs (which do not need to have a
> Standards-Version header)
Thanks for the well-researched bug report! Lintian did not complain
about a missing field in a udeb. It was missing from the
Package: lintian
Version: 2.104.0
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Running lintian from bullseye on udebs (which do not need to have a
Standards-Version header) results in lintian throwing an error. e.g.:
E: partman-basicmethods source: required-field debian/control@source
Standards-Version
4 matches
Mail list logo
