Bug#992060: pytsk: please make the build reproducible

2022-12-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-12-29, Hilko Bengen wrote: > * Vagrant Cascadian: > >> I have uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/10 applying the patch included >> upstream: > > Looks good to me. Feel free to reschedule the upload to hit unstable > immediately. Thanks... rescheduled! live well, vagrant signature.asc

Bug#992060: pytsk: please make the build reproducible

2022-12-29 Thread Hilko Bengen
* Vagrant Cascadian: > I have uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/10 applying the patch included > upstream: Looks good to me. Feel free to reschedule the upload to hit unstable immediately. Cheers, -Hilko

Bug#992060: pytsk: please make the build reproducible

2022-12-29 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: tags 992060 pending On 2021-08-10, Chris Lamb wrote: > Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that > pytsk could not be built reproducibly. > > This is because it generated a pytsk3.c file in a nondeterministic > manner, specifically by naively iterating over a

Bug#992060: pytsk: please make the build reproducible

2021-08-10 Thread Chris Lamb
forwarded 992060 https://github.com/py4n6/pytsk/pull/81 thanks I've forwarded this upstream here: https://github.com/py4n6/pytsk/pull/81 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#992060: pytsk: please make the build reproducible

2021-08-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: pytsk Version: 20200117-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: randomness X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that pytsk could not be built