On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 02:08:44AM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>On 2022-06-28 15:18 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 03:08:52PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>
>> >Can we have a progress/blockers update?
>>
>> I'm currently testing builds of the latest shim release (15.6) on all
>> 3
On 2022-06-28 15:18 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 03:08:52PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> >Can we have a progress/blockers update?
>
> I'm currently testing builds of the latest shim release (15.6) on all
> 3 platforms (amd64, i386 and arm64). It now builds reproducibly on
>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 03:08:52PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>On 2022-04-27 13:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm hacking on shim right now, setting up local CI etc. to help me
>> with testing. As soon as I can validate that arm64 stuff is working
>> correctly now, I'll take out the hacks I added.
On 2022-04-27 13:40 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm hacking on shim right now, setting up local CI etc. to help me
> with testing. As soon as I can validate that arm64 stuff is working
> correctly now, I'll take out the hacks I added. Give me a few days...
Gentle prod Steve.
I know how those
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 01:33:47PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
>Binutils 2.38 now has proper PE/COFF output support for arm64.
>(And is in unstable and testing.)
>https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-February/119721.html
>
>I think this is the relevant bit:
>"Support for efi-app-aarch64,
Binutils 2.38 now has proper PE/COFF output support for arm64.
(And is in unstable and testing.)
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-February/119721.html
I think this is the relevant bit:
"Support for efi-app-aarch64, efi-rtdrv-aarch64 and
efi-bsdrv-aarch64 has been added to objcopy
Hi,
On 10-08-2021 19:02, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> As a data point, the Huawei cloud infra where ci.debian.net runs arm64
> workers (for arm*) does use Secure Boot on arm64, and applying security
> updates broke our machines there.
Just a proper follow-up. It seems we were hit by the
Package: shim-signed
Version: 1.38+15.4-7
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Thanks for you work on shim-signed.
I have read both the package changelog and the NEWS file, and I
understand the reason for dropping the signed shim support for arm64.
I'm opening this bug
8 matches
Mail list logo
