Hi,
On 2021-09-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 12:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
> >
>
> To confirm some IRC conversations - given the closeness of the freeze
> for 11.1, please feel free to upload and kibi can review the package
>
Adam D. Barratt (2021-09-30):
> To confirm some IRC conversations - given the closeness of the freeze
> for 11.1, please feel free to upload and kibi can review the package
> from stable-new.
No objections, and apologies for the lag.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 12:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
To confirm some IRC conversations - given the closeness of the freeze
for 11.1, please feel free to upload and kibi can review the package
from stable-new.
Regards,
Adam
> Control: fixed 994042
Hi,
On 2021-09-27 12:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
> Control: fixed 994042 2.32-3
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2021-09-26 at 22:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2021-09-26 20:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 23:47 +0200, Aurelien
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Control: fixed 994042 2.32-3
Hi,
On Sun, 2021-09-26 at 22:16 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-09-26 20:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 23:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > [...]
> > > In the meantime another issue that would
Hi,
On 2021-09-26 20:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 23:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [...]
> > In the meantime another issue that would need to be fixed in sid
> > > > came
> > as
> > bug#994042.
> >
> > This time the issue is in the preinst. To summarize, in the case
>
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 23:47 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[...]
> In the meantime another issue that would need to be fixed in sid
> > > came
> as
> bug#994042.
>
> This time the issue is in the preinst. To summarize, in the case
> debconf is not usable to prompt the user about the upgrade, the
>
control: tag -1 - confirmed
On 2021-09-04 15:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
>
> On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:58 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > During the upgrade from Buster to Bullseye, the SSH server is not
> > restarted following the libc6 upgrade, causing new SSH
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sun, 2021-08-22 at 14:58 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> During the upgrade from Buster to Bullseye, the SSH server is not
> restarted following the libc6 upgrade, causing new SSH connections to
> get rejected until the SSH server is restarted later in the
On 2021-08-22 14:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
>
> [ Reason ]
> During the upgrade from Buster to Bullseye, the SSH server is
Hi,
On 22-08-2021 14:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The alternative is to read the release notes and upgrade openssh-server
> before upgrading the full system.
That would be this paragraph:
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#ssh-not-available
It
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
[ Reason ]
During the upgrade from Buster to Bullseye, the SSH server is not
restarted following the libc6 upgrade, causing new SSH
12 matches
Mail list logo
