On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:13:16PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Quoting Steve Langasek (2022-09-09 07:09:32)
> > My feedback to you on IRC was that I think it's inappropriate for you to go
> > package-by-package in the BTS to the packages in the base set expecting
Hi Steve,
Quoting Steve Langasek (2022-09-09 07:09:32)
> My feedback to you on IRC was that I think it's inappropriate for you to go
> package-by-package in the BTS to the packages in the base set expecting
> support for a feature that has to my knowledge never been surfaced for
> project-wide
Hello,
On Sun 18 Sep 2022 at 03:11PM +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> wrote:
>> From my side, I'd be fine with the TC pausing any action on this issue and
>> waiting for our mail to d-devel first. This is assuming
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 11:57:48PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
> From my side, I'd be fine with the TC pausing any action on this issue and
> waiting for our mail to d-devel first. This is assuming that if there is no
> opposition to the DPKG_ROOT idea, that Steve then
Hi,
Quoting Steve Langasek (2022-09-10 22:16:55)
> > > > For the record I do not consider this an override requiring a
> > > > supermajority and would abide by a majority TC decision.
>
> > > Thank you for your input. The TC can just issue advice after reviewing
> > > the proposed changes, in
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 09/09/2022 19:45, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Hello,
> > On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:09PM -07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > For the record I do not consider this an override requiring a
> > > supermajority and would abide by a majority
On 09/09/2022 19:45, Sean Whitton wrote:
Hello,
On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:09PM -07, Steve Langasek wrote:
For the record I do not consider this an override requiring a
supermajority and would abide by a majority TC decision.
Thank you for your input. The TC can just issue advice after
Hello,
On Thu 08 Sep 2022 at 10:09PM -07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> For the record I do not consider this an override requiring a
> supermajority and would abide by a majority TC decision.
Thank you for your input. The TC can just issue advice after reviewing
the proposed changes, in this case.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi technical comittee members,
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Within three weeks I want Steve to reply to this bug in a way that
> > addresses Sam's needs or Sam to agree with moving forward
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 decide whether pam should support DPKG_ROOT
Control: tags -2 =
Control: reassign -2 tech-ctte
Hi technical comittee members,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:44:54PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Within three weeks I want Steve to reply to this bug in a way
Hi Sam and Steve,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 02:22:53PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In any case, as long as we are actively discussing the technical means,
> we have no intention to push for a rapid inclusion. To the contrary:
> Please wait with applying the proposed changes as long as the
Hi Sam,
I'm very glad about your mail.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 05:57:15PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> [Feel free to quote in public with attribution.
> I'm sending privately to allow you to control distribution.]
Thank you for your trust in me. I think that your mail is mostly
technical and
Hi Sam,
Quoting Sam Hartman (2022-01-18 01:28:50)
> > "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> > writes:
>
> Johannes> Hi Steve, Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
> Johannes> (2021-12-08 10:00:31)
> Johannes> Since it has been more than a month without any
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
Johannes> Hi Steve, Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
Johannes> (2021-12-08 10:00:31)
Johannes> Since it has been more than a month without any reply I
Johannes> just uploaded a NMU of pam with the attached
Hi Steve,
Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-12-08 10:00:31)
> support for DPKG_ROOT has been accepted by the maintainers of base-passwd,
> bash, coreutils, dash, dbus, debconf, debhelper, debianutils, dpkg, glibc, and
> shadow.
>
> base-files and pam are the only two remaining
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
Johannes> Control: user debian-d...@lists.debian.org Control:
Johannes> usertag -1 + dpkg-root-support
Johannes> Hi Sam,
Johannes> Quoting Helmut Grohne (2021-09-24 18:14:28)
>> So if you continue refusing our
Control: user debian-d...@lists.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + dpkg-root-support
Hi Sam,
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2021-09-24 18:14:28)
> So if you continue refusing our patches, can you propose any other way to
> move forward?
it has been a month since your last mail, so I wanted to send a
Hi Sam,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 08:26:16AM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
> This seems... fragile. In order for this patch to work, you're also
> asking the pam maintainers going forward to think differently about all
> file accesses in maintainer scripts.
While this may be true, I don't think it
[Steve, your thoughts welcome]
> "Johannes" == Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
Johannes> Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-08-28
Johannes> 10:03:49)
>> Unfortunately, only the patch in the original message got applied
>> in 1.4.0-10 but I posted an
Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-08-28 10:03:49)
> Unfortunately, only the patch in the original message got applied in
> 1.4.0-10 but I posted an updated patch in message #23 of that bug.
>
> I attached a patch containing the remaining required changes.
For your convenience, I
Source: pam
Version: 1.4.0-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi Sam & Steve,
thanks a lot for fixing #983427!
Unfortunately, only the patch in the original message got applied in
1.4.0-10 but I posted an updated patch in message #23 of that bug.
I attached a patch containing the remaining
21 matches
Mail list logo
