On 30 September 2021 10:11:47 pm IST, "Torrance, Douglas"
wrote:
>On Thu 30 Sep 2021 10:47:16 AM EDT, Nilesh Patra
>wrote:
> I didn't realize this and just made the change based Lintian's [...]
Perfectly understandable.
I wonder if it makes sense to open a bug report against lintian to not
On Thu 30 Sep 2021 10:47:16 AM EDT, Nilesh Patra
wrote:
I happened to notice that you added a uversionmangle rule to convert "1.10-2" to
"1.10.2"
this is not good, we are not supposed to convert hyphenations into "." for R
packages,
as this goes counter-productive, for managing dependencies
Hi again, Doug,
On 9/29/21 4:59 PM, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
>> I'm also interested in this package (well, partitions are interesting
>> always) will you
>> allow me to add myself to uploaders along with you?
>
> Please do!
I happened to notice that you added a uversionmangle rule to convert
On Wed 29 Sep 2021 03:45:23 AM EDT, Nilesh Patra
wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 9/29/21 1:44 AM, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
I've just finished packaging r-cran-partitions (ITP #994218), which would be
headed for the NEW queue and so needs a binary upload.
Uploaded with minor
Hi Doug,
On 9/29/21 1:44 AM, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> I've just finished packaging r-cran-partitions (ITP #994218), which would be
> headed for the NEW queue and so needs a binary upload.
Uploaded with minor copyright change. Thanks!
I'm also interested in this
Control: tags -1 pending
I've just finished packaging r-cran-partitions (ITP #994218), which would be
headed for the NEW queue and so needs a binary upload. Since I'm only a DM,
would anyone be able to review/sponsor?
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-partitions
Thanks!
Doug
6 matches
Mail list logo
