Bug#994259: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#994259: resfinder: autopkgtest regression on armhf and i386: db_resfinder --kmaPath /usr/bin/kma' returned non-zero exit status 1

2021-09-15 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Paul, Paul Gevers, on 2021-09-15: > On 15-09-2021 18:51, Étienne Mollier wrote: > > I intend to adjust the d/tests/control Architecture field of > > resfinder to match the (pending upload) list of architectures > > supported by kma. Would this be sufficient to bring back > > resfinder to

Bug#994259: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#994259: resfinder: autopkgtest regression on armhf and i386: db_resfinder --kmaPath /usr/bin/kma' returned non-zero exit status 1

2021-09-15 Thread Étienne Mollier
Hi Paul, Paul Gevers, on 2021-09-14: > With a recent upload of resfinder the autopkgtest of resfinder fails in > testing on armhf and i386 when that autopkgtest is run with the binary > packages of resfinder from unstable. It passes when run with only > packages from testing. True, newer

Bug#994259: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#994259: resfinder: autopkgtest regression on armhf and i386: db_resfinder --kmaPath /usr/bin/kma' returned non-zero exit status 1

2021-09-15 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 15-09-2021 18:51, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I intend to adjust the d/tests/control Architecture field of > resfinder to match the (pending upload) list of architectures > supported by kma. Would this be sufficient to bring back > resfinder to testing, or is there some knob to twiddle on CI

Bug#994259: resfinder: autopkgtest regression on armhf and i386: db_resfinder --kmaPath /usr/bin/kma' returned non-zero exit status 1

2021-09-14 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: resfinder Version: 4.1.5-1 X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: regression Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of resfinder the autopkgtest of resfinder fails in testing on armhf and i386 when that autopkgtest is run