On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > > altree recommends libopenblas-base, which is a transitional dummy package.
> > > Please replace it by libopenblas0.
> >
> > this is fixed in Git but when rebuilding (with more recent gcc) I get
>
> I built the package
On 17/09/2021 19:45, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 22:48, Vincent Danjean mailto:vdanj...@debian.org>> wrote:
I cannot push to salsa (yet) because I'm not in the Debian-Med groups
nor in the members of the altree project. I just requested the Debian-Med
group
On Fri, 17 Sept 2021 at 22:48, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 17/09/2021 15:40, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> >I built the package locally, installed it and executed the
> > debian/tests/run-unit-test manually.
> >No errors occurred (with gcc from up-to-date unstable, ie
> > gcc=4:10.2.1-1 and
On 17/09/2021 15:40, Vincent Danjean wrote:
I built the package locally, installed it and executed the
debian/tests/run-unit-test manually.
No errors occurred (with gcc from up-to-date unstable, ie
gcc=4:10.2.1-1 and gcc-10=10.3.0-10).
Did you try with gcc from experimental ?
I
On 17/09/2021 14:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:03:44PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
altree recommends libopenblas-base, which is a transitional dummy package.
Please replace it by libopenblas0.
this is fixed in Git but when rebuilding
Hi,
On 17/09/2021 14:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:03:44PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
altree recommends libopenblas-base, which is a transitional dummy package.
Please replace it by libopenblas0.
this is fixed in Git but when
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:03:44PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> altree recommends libopenblas-base, which is a transitional dummy package.
> Please replace it by libopenblas0.
this is fixed in Git but when rebuilding (with more recent gcc) I get
7 matches
Mail list logo
