Hi,
Quoting Andreas Tille (2021-09-30 14:09:00)
> Am Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:46:20PM +0200 schrieb Jeroen Ooms:
> > I think the actual bug is that apt prefers
> > graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat over the actual libmagick++-dev. I
> > don't understand why this has started happening (it wasn't
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Am Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 09:46:20PM +0200 schrieb Jeroen Ooms:
>
> I think the actual bug is that apt prefers
> graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat over the actual libmagick++-dev. I
> don't understand why this has started happening (it wasn't the case
> for
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 9:40 PM Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Quoting Jeroen Ooms (2021-09-29 20:54:17)
> > The relevant part of the build log is actually:
> >
> > > Package Magick++ was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > > Perhaps you should add the directory
Hi all,
Quoting Jeroen Ooms (2021-09-29 20:54:17)
> The relevant part of the build log is actually:
>
> > Package Magick++ was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `Magick++.pc'
> > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> > No package
The relevant part of the build log is actually:
> Package Magick++ was not found in the pkg-config search path.
> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `Magick++.pc'
> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
> No package 'Magick++' found
> Warning: found GraphicsMagick++ instead of
Control: tags -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 Jeroen Ooms
Hi Jeroen,
I take the freedom to simply forward this bug report about the Debian
packaged version of magick to you. Please let me know if you need
more information.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 03:12:06PM
6 matches
Mail list logo
