Hi Guillem,
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/414
>
> On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 15:14:10 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > I'd have to re-dig all this. I might just try to provide
Control: tag -1 patch
Control: forwarded -1
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/414
On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 15:14:10 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'd have to re-dig all this. I might just try to provide a patch, I
> > think should probably be a
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Guillem,
Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Can you please elaborate what exactly is the bug? You refer to
> > something being problematic without explaining what actually is
> > problematic.
>
> lintian used to exit with a non-zero value when it emitted at least
> one error
Hi!
On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 01:26:02 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > So the problematic --fail-on default change never got actually reverted
> > as the patch applied in commit 3758bfafd5dd742c327f2312dac8e3a71b1f036e
> > omitted the relevant part that would make it work. :(
>
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Guillem,
I'm trying to catch up with that chaos which is in lintian's current
state.
Guillem Jover wrote:
> So the problematic --fail-on default change never got actually reverted
> as the patch applied in commit
Hi Guillem,
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 6:57 PM Guillem Jover wrote:
>
> Unamused,
I am sorry that happened. Did I not accept your patch in full? [1]
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/3758bfafd5dd742c327f2312dac8e3a71b1f036e
Package: lintian
Version: 2.77.0
Severity: serious
Sigh,
So the problematic --fail-on default change never got actually reverted
as the patch applied in commit 3758bfafd5dd742c327f2312dac8e3a71b1f036e
omitted the relevant part that would make it work. :(
None of the previous arguments against
7 matches
Mail list logo
