On 23 February 2022 6:39:57 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Am Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 01:52:26PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>> Even if we give out sources It looks * very * unlikely for someone to edit
>> this in what is a part of
>> an * R * package.
>
>I'd rephrase "looks *very* unlikely" to
Am Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 01:52:26PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> This was what I was fearing.
> I need to admit that this is a 'gigantic' waste of everyone's time to be
> doing this.
Yes.
> Even if we give out sources It looks * very * unlikely for someone to edit
> this in what is a part
Hi Nilesh,
Am Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:24:41PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> bslib is needed for the new rmarkdown update, and it is being used in other
> packages
> in the ecosystem as well, as it seems.
Thanks a lot for working on this!
> When I looked at the source, it comes with a few
On 2/23/22 12:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:24:41PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
When I looked at the source, it comes with a few minified javascript files,
which have sources
so I can manage this.
What looked like a bit of a problem to me is that it vendors several
Hi all,
[ CC'ed Andreas who last worked on this ]
bslib is needed for the new rmarkdown update, and it is being used in other
packages
in the ecosystem as well, as it seems.
When I looked at the source, it comes with a few minified javascript files,
which have sources
so I can manage this.
5 matches
Mail list logo
