Bug#997016: closed by Bastian Germann (Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator)

2021-12-21 Thread Seunghun Han
-- > From: Bastian Germann > To: 997016-d...@bugs.debian.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 02:03:10 +0100 > Subject: Re: Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM > emulator > Uploaded. Thank you! > > > -- Forwarded messa

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-12-19 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-17 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:29 PM Seunghun Han wrote: > > No, that can be done later. But I don't like the raised issue about the > > manpages sections. > > The *.conf and *.options belong to section 5 instead of 8. Please hand in a > > patch upstream and then > > import it as a

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-10 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Sun, Nov 7, 2021 at 6:03 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > No, that can be done later. But I don't like the raised issue about the > manpages sections. > The *.conf and *.options belong to section 5 instead of 8. Please hand in a > patch upstream and then > import it as a quilt patch

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-06 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:35:23 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote: Please check the pipeline result below. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm/-/pipelines/310288 Anyway, there are still some problems with reprotest and cross-build. Should I solve them, too? No, that can be

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-04 Thread Matthew Fernandez
> On Nov 3, 2021, at 19:30, Seunghun Han wrote: > >> I am also not sure if you are allowed to write in /tmp on package building. >> I will check that. > Everyone has write access right to /tmp directory, so I guess the > package also has it. I don’t think this is the cause of the failures,

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-04 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 11:30 AM Seunghun Han wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:43 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > The failing build is on i386 and also fails natively on my i386 machine. > > It looks a bit like Y2K38 triggering... > I'm sorry. I missed the point that i386 means 32bit

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-03 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:43 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > Can you explain why it builds on amd64 when it is docker related? I'm sorry that I didn't explain it in detail. The previous build error occurred at GitLab runner, and I found it was a docker environment. To have the identical

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-03 Thread Bastian Germann
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:45:41 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote: Hi Bastian, On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:06 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > Should I fix them by adding a new feature to detect the docker environment? > > That would be nice but is not necessary. If so, I would like to leave it. If you don't

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-02 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 1:06 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > Should I fix them by adding a new feature to detect the docker environment? > > That would be nice but is not necessary. If so, I would like to leave it. If you don't mind, would you support the swtpm package [1]? That's the

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-01 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:21:17 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote: > The build fails. See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm/-/jobs/2129890 I fixed it, and there is no more builded error now. However, some test cases needed native environment, not docker, so they failed. New

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-01 Thread Seunghun Han
Hi Bastian, > I have created https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm and granted you > maintainer access. Please use that repo from now on. Thank you for your help and giving an access right to debian/swtpm repo. > The upstream branch is a mix of upstream's git commits and gbp imports. > Please

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-11-01 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:23:48 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: The watch file still needs work. See the uversionmangle in Feri's comment. The build fails. See https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm/-/jobs/2129890 Please untag moreinfo when those are done.

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-29 Thread wferi
Seunghun Han writes: >>> swtpm - Libtpms-based TPM emulator >>> swtpm-dev - Include files for the TPM emulator's CUSE interface >>> swtpm-libs - Common libraries for TPM emulators >> >> Why do you deviate from the usual libswtpm-dev/libswtpm0 package names? >> Including the SO version in

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-29 Thread Bastian Germann
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:37:12 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote: Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Thank you for your help, Bastian. I just uploaded a new package [1] to mentors.debian.net. Please check it if there are any other issues. I have created https://salsa.debian.org/debian/swtpm and granted you

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-29 Thread Seunghun Han
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Thank you for your help, Bastian. I just uploaded a new package [1] to mentors.debian.net. Please check it if there are any other issues. Best regards, Seunghun [1]: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/ On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:59 AM Bastian Germann wrote: >

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-27 Thread Bastian Germann
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Please remove the moreinfo tag when you have dealt with the version number and possibly removed the static library (is there a version that loads libtpms dynamically?). Please keep the soversion in the library name. So no rename.

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2021-10-24 at 14:24 +0200, wf...@niif.hu wrote: > libraries (like libswtpm_libtpms.a) This library sounds like an embedded code copy, if it is one, please follow the advice on this wiki page. libtpms is already in Debian. https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCopies -- bye, pabs

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-24 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Feri, Thank you for your advice. > The upstream version number should be 0.7.0~rc2 with a tilde instead of > a hyphen to ensure proper ordering (as Lintian warns about). To do such > transformations automatically, put something like this in the watch file: > >

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-24 Thread wferi
Seunghun Han writes: > * Package name: swtpm >Version : 0.7.0-rc2-1 Hi, The upstream version number should be 0.7.0~rc2 with a tilde instead of a hyphen to ensure proper ordering (as Lintian warns about). To do such transformations automatically, put something like this in

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-23 Thread Seunghun Han
Hello Bastian, Thank you for your advice. I rewrite the change log according to it. If you don't mind, would you support the package below? swtpm: https://mentors.debian.net/package/swtpm/ Best regards, Seunghun On Sat, Oct 23, 2021 at 5:56 AM Bastian Germann wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-22 Thread Bastian Germann
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 20:33:38 +0900 Seunghun Han wrote: swtpm (0.7.0-rc2-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New maintainer (Closes: #941199) * Changed Standard-Version to 4.5.1 in debian/control * Updated debhelper version to 13 in debian/control * Added Rules-Requires-Root to

Bug#997016: RFS: swtpm/0.7.0-rc2-1 [ITA] -- Libtpms-based TPM emulator

2021-10-22 Thread Seunghun Han
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swtpm": * Package name: swtpm Version : 0.7.0-rc2-1 Upstream Author : Stefan Berger * URL : https://github.com/stefanberger/swtpm * License :