Thanks for the update.
Having a Debian package (even an unofficial one) would be nice. I can
still post install instructions for it in our README file.
Is it possible to rename the existing package or add warning to it to
let people know the "doas" package in Debian is actually OpenDoas and
not
Hello,
A little update on this issue. I found out that I am not be able to
upload both packages into the Debian repositories since the two programs are
too similar to each other. However I can provide packages for slicer69/doas on
a git repo since the packaging for it is pretty much done.
I am
On 2022-04-17 11:49 a.m., Scupake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm very very sorry for taking an unreasonable time to reply and resolve
> this issue. I will try to be more active from now on.
>
> I'm also currently packaging slicer69/doas, though I still haven't
> decided on a name, I would like to use
Hello,
I'm very very sorry for taking an unreasonable time to reply and resolve
this issue. I will try to be more active from now on.
I'm also currently packaging slicer69/doas, though I still haven't
decided on a name, I would like to use "doas-portable" if it is at least
mentioned in
This issue has been open for several months now without an update and
I'd like to encourage its resolution. The upstream doas project is still
getting issue reports [1] which are resulting from confusion in the
naming between "doas" versus "OpenDoas". Ideally this package should
have its name
5 matches
Mail list logo
