Bug#613534: Seems to be rather a bug in nvidia, not the kernel

On Mi, 08 iun 11, 11:47:02, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2011-06-01 21:08, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > Just tried it. I had to also use nvidia-glx from wheezy, as 195 won't > > build on 2.6.38, but I could definitely reproduce the bug. > > I can send you a 195xx nvidia-kernel-dkms package that shou

Bug#623955: nvidia-glx: regressions with GeForce 8200

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Andreas Beckmann wrote: 275.09.04-1 (beta) is available in experimental. Please retry. This version is said to fix some regressions with KDE. For me, no difference with the previous experimental version. It works not quite as well as when a version mismatch disables some t

Bug#629692: nfs-utils: FTBFS: gssapi_ext.h:398:5: error: expected ')' before 'gss_buffer_t'

reassign 629692 libgssglue-dev merge 629692 629553 thanks This is a libgssglue-dev bug; it's incompatible with RFC 5587 and partially replaces one of libkrb5-dev's headers. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l

Bug#629692: nfs-utils: FTBFS: gssapi_ext.h:398:5: error: expected ')' before 'gss_buffer_t'

affects 629692 + src:nfs-utils src:krb5 thanks > This is a libgssglue-dev bug; it's incompatible with RFC 5587 and > partially replaces one of libkrb5-dev's headers. Thanks for your time; I'm hereby documenting that. Cheers, -- OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists

Bug#629700: pd-bassemu: FTBFS: bassemu~.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-08 17:19, Didier Raboud wrote: > Source: pd-bassemu > Version: 0.3-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a rebu

Bug#629603: Acknowledgement (cyrus-common-2.4: Fails to upgrade to 2.4.9~beta1-1)

I've attached two patches. The first once changes grep to exclude the *_path options in lib/imapoptions. This ensures cyrus-db-types.txt is generated correctly. Next, cyrus-common-2.4.postinst was only setting RET if upgrade-db failed. So RET was null in the case statement, triggering the f

Bug#583483: Bug#610888: libpam-ldap: allow any LDAP users even when pam_check_host_attr

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:29:45PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > > While I'm still weighing whether to change pam_unix for bug #583492, it is > > definitely the case that pam_ldap's authorization checks should be > > 'Additional' and not 'Primary' because, as seen here, they are intended to > > alwa

Bug#629818: xen-qemu-dm-4.0: not compatible with Xen 4.1 to be migrated to testing

Package: xen-qemu-dm-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-3 Severity: serious Given the source package name it's pretty clear that it isn't compatible with Xen 4.1 by design. The latter is now ready to migrate to wheezy and this package also blocks the removal of python2.5 from testing. Hence this RC bug as a not

Bug#629648: lintian: missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support FP for -dev packages

I think the patterns I used for this check were based on others already in use in lintian. I agree that this should probably only be applied to real files, not to compat symlinks. But, do we risk getting a false negative for cases where the real file has a weird filename whereas the soname (as pr

Bug#629817: kwwidgets: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by `bin/libKWWidgets.so.1.0.1009.0'. Stop.

Source: kwwidgets Version: 1.0.0~cvs20100930-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: ***

Bug#629815: gofigure2: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by `lib/libvtkRenderingAddOn2.so.0.8'. Stop.

Source: gofigure2 Version: 0.8.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[3]: *** No rule to m

Bug#629816: ifrit: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by `/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/ifrit'. Stop.

Source: ifrit Version: 3.3.4-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > /usr/bin/c++ -DI_USE_CURSES

Bug#626094: perl: debian/patches/fixes/processPL.diff is obsolete

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:03:51PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:10:13PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > > At some point I think we should revert the patch, possibly with some test > > > rebuilds first to make sure no other package in the archive is relying >

Bug#629730: firmware-free: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: linux-support-2.6.38-1

tag 629730 + patch kthxbye On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:17:15PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: firmware-free > Version: 3 > Severity: serious > Tags: wheezy sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > Hi, > > During a re

Bug#629691: libxcb build fails with "nocheck" in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

Steve McIntyre (08/06/2011): > Thanks for the quick response. :-) No problem. > I'm not sure that will do the right thing for the build dir, though, > which is currently set up by doing: > > $(MAKE) -C $(DEB_BUILDDIR) check > > > > A quick check suggests it doesn't DTRT. With the exist

Bug#629688: libvte9: malicious escape sequence causes gnome-terminal to crash (memory consumption DoS)

forwarded 629688 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652124 severity 629688 grave tag 629688 + security thanks Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 16:50 +0200, vladz a écrit : > To reproduce the crash: > > $ printf "\033[10@" > /tmp/x > $ cat /tmp/x Thanks for the report. I th

Bug#609754: License for examples

Francois, I am looking to upload your example code, but I noticed you did not license the code. If you could either assert what the license is here in an email, or re-submit the patch with license headers, that should be sufficient. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@

Bug#629814: ITP: bridge-method-injector -- Evolve Java classes without breaking compatibility

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: bridge-method-injector Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi * URL : http://bridge-method-injector.infradna.com/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Java Description : Evolve

Bug#619275: Perl Policy change to document major version upgrade trigger

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:13:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > + > +Perl Package Upgrades > + > + Starting from perl 5.12.3-2, a dpkg trigger > + named perl-major-upgrade will be triggered by the > + postinst of the perl package during major

Bug#629813: swish++: FTBFS: encoded_char.h:55:10: error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type

Source: swish++ Version: 6.1.5-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > g++ -I. -DCHARSET_utf7 -DCH

Bug#629691: libxcb build fails with "nocheck" in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:26:05PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >and thanks for the report. Thanks for the quick response. :-) >Steve McIntyre (08/06/2011): >> I'm currently working on cross-building bits of Debian and libxcb >> fails to build. This is because of the "nocheck" support in

Bug#629812: kvpnc: importing a .p12 certificate takes ages

Package: kvpnc Version: 0.9.6a-2 Severity: normal Hi, I have .p12 certificates for IPSEC usage, and kvpnc uses a lot of time importing such certificates, on the order of five minutes at least, while both disk and cpu are idle. Kind regards, --Toni++ -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0

Bug#629811: util-linux: Please don't run hwclock when running under systemd

Package: util-linux Version: 2.17.2-9.1 Severity: wishlist systemd > 25 sets the hwclock itself, based on the contents of /etc/adjtime, so /lib/udev/hwclock-set should not do anything if running under systemd. Just adding if [ -e /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd ]; then exit 0 fi near the top should be

Bug#629810: freepops: FTBFS: make[2]: ps2pdf: Command not found

Source: freepops Version: 0.2.9-4.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: ps2pdf: Command

Bug#629809: autoclass: FTBFS: /bin/sh: ps2pdf: not found

Source: autoclass Version: 3.3.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is probably a matter of moving the ps2

Bug#620947: Suggestion to use something like /run/man instead of /var/cache/man [Was: Acknowledgement (/etc/cron.daily/man-db every day touches localization subdirectories in /var/cache/man/)]

In addition to my bug report I would like to suggest to use something like /run/man instead of /var/cache/man, i.e., keeping the whole man page cache in RAM. On my (personal use) systems the size of /var/cache/man is below 3 MB. I have no idea how big this directory grows if every package is instal

Bug#629808: Should depend on, not recommend, libnvidia-compiler

Package: nvidia-opencl-icd Version: 270.41.19-1 Severity: important When trying to come with solution to #628702 I played with dependencies of python-pycuda. I build it depending on libopencl1 and opencl-icd, which IMO should be sufficient to get OpenCL implementation to work. I have removed libnv

Bug#629807: pd-zexy: FTBFS: configure: error: m_pd.h is desperately needed! (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-zexy Version: 2.2.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > test

Bug#629806: pd-wiimote: FTBFS: wiimote.c:34:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-wiimote Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629805: pd-readanysf: FTBFS: src/readanysf~.cpp:34:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-readanysf Version: 0.42-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[1]: Entering direc

Bug#629804: fix ipsec-tools FTBFS

Package: ipsec-tools Version: 1:0.8.0-3.1 Hi, gcc has changed its behavior so that it now returns error when it sees unknown flags. configure was passing -R to gcc at times and counting on this behavior to ignore -R. Now it must pass -Wl,-R. With this debdiff, ipsec-tools compiles for me in si

Bug#629534: Upgrade fails, resulting in unusable system (no dynamic linking)

Package: libc6 Version: 2.13-5 Severity: normal I upgraded libc6 from 2.13-4 -> 2.13-5 and experienced no difficulties. But this is Sid amd64. Regards, Hugo Vanwoerkom -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers oldstable APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable') A

Bug#629803: pd-windowing: FTBFS: bartlett~.c:22:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-windowing Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629802: pd-vbap: FTBFS: vbap.h:5:24: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-vbap Version: 1.0.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629801: pd-smlib: FTBFS: defines.h:1:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-smlib Version: 0.12.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629800: pd-sigpack: FTBFS: chop~.c:6:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-sigpack Version: 0.0.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build >

Bug#629799: pd-pmpd: FTBFS: iAmbient2D.c:1:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-pmpd Version: 0.9-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh buil

Bug#629798: pd-plugin: FTBFS: plugin~.h:2:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-plugin Version: 0.2.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#629797: pd-pdogg: FTBFS: oggamp~.c:33:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-pdogg Version: 0.25-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh --

Bug#629796: pd-pddp: FTBFS: pddplink.c:11:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev)

Source: pd-pddp Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > debian/rules build > dh --wi

Bug#628773: new version fixes keyboard trouble

Antoine Martin writes: > As for the issue of packaging it for debian, I have done some work to > tidy up the code/man page, etc. > And I have been making DEBs available for over a year here: > http://winswitch.org/downloads/ > Let me know if there's anything else that is required. > I would gladly

Bug#629795: vala-terminal: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev

Source: vala-terminal Version: 1.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629794: trackballs: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libglu1-xorg-dev, xlibmesa-gl-dev

Source: trackballs Version: 1.1.4-4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629793: dbmail: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libgmime-2.0-2-dev

Source: dbmail Version: 2.2.17-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629792: nagios-statd: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: python2.5

Source: nagios-statd Version: 3.12-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629791: pd-libdir: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: puredata (< 0.43)

Source: pd-libdir Version: 1.9-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629790: geordi: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-utf8-string-dev

Source: geordi Version: 0:20080916T2006-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629789: emile: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: gcc-3.4, gcc-3.4-m68k-linux-gnu

Source: emile Version: 0.11-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629788: libfprint: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev

Source: libfprint Version: 20110418git-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629787: wiipdf: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libcwiid1-dev

Source: wiipdf Version: 1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629786: libfsotransport: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: libfsotransport Version: 0.9.5.9+git20100507-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629785: bzr-svn: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzr (< 2.4~) but 2.4.0~beta3-2 is to be installed

Source: bzr-svn Version: 1.0.4+bzr3475-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629784: darcs-monitor: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libghc6-haxml-dev (< 1.14), libghc6-haxml-dev (< 1:1.14)

Source: darcs-monitor Version: 0.3.8-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629783: loggerhead: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzr (< 2.4.0~beta1-2) but 2.4.0~beta3-2 is to be installed

Source: loggerhead Version: 1.18.1-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629782: fso-misc-vapi: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev

Source: fso-misc-vapi Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629781: pymvpa: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: python-docutils (< 0.6) but 0.7-2 is to be installed

Source: pymvpa Version: 0.4.7-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629780: mdbus: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8)

Source: mdbus Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629779: puredata-import: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: puredata (< 0.43)

Source: puredata-import Version: 1.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629778: hedgewars: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libghc6-utf8-string-dev, libghc6-time-dev

Source: hedgewars Version: 0.9.15-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629777: libjogl2-java: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libswt-gtk-3.5-java

Source: libjogl2-java Version: 2.0-rc2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629776: geda-xgsch2pcb: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: python-gtk2 (< 2.10) but 2.24.0-2 is to be installed

Source: geda-xgsch2pcb Version: 0.1.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629775: pan: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libgmime-2.0-2-dev

Source: pan Version: 0.133-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629774: datapacker: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libghc6-unix-dev, libghc6-filepath-dev

Source: datapacker Version: 1.0.1+nmu1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629773: iceape: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: dpkg-dev (<= 1.14.7) but 1.16.0.3 is to be installed

Source: iceape Version: 2.0.14-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629772: pxsl-tools: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-containers-dev

Source: pxsl-tools Version: 1.0-4.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629771: luabind: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: boost-build (>= 2.0-m12-0~)

Source: luabind Version: 0.9.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629770: autotrace: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev

Source: autotrace Version: 0.31.1-15 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629769: gnuift: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev

Source: gnuift Version: 0.1.14-10 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629768: ooo-build-extensions: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: openoffice.org-dev (>= 1:3.0.0-3)

Source: ooo-build-extensions Version: 3.0.0.9+r14588-9 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629767: ember: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libceguiogre-dev

Source: ember Version: 0.5.7-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629766: cia-clients: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzr (< 2.4.0~beta1-2) but 2.4.0~beta3-2 is to be installed

Source: cia-clients Version: 20110501 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629765: salome: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: sip4

Source: salome Version: 5.1.3-12 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629764: libtuxcap: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: libmagick9-dev, libmagick++9-dev

Source: libtuxcap Version: 1.4.0.dfsg2-1.2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629763: libfsobasics: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: libfsobasics Version: 0.9.0+git20100509-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629762: tuxonice-userui: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libusplash-dev

Source: tuxonice-userui Version: 1.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629761: asterisk-espeak: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: asterisk-dev (< 1:1.6.3) but 1:1.8.4.2-1 is to be installed

Source: asterisk-espeak Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629760: sawfish: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: texinfo (< 4.11)

Source: sawfish Version: 1:1.5.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629759: ruby-actionmailer-2.3: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: ruby-text-format (>= 0.6.3~)

Source: ruby-actionmailer-2.3 Version: 2.3.11-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629758: vala-dbus-binding-tool: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.7.10)

Source: vala-dbus-binding-tool Version: 0.1.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629757: tipcutils: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: linux-libc-dev (< 2.6.34) but 2.6.39-1+b1 is to be installed

Source: tipcutils Version: 1.0.4-7 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629756: llvm-defaults: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libllvm-ocaml-2.8-dev (>= 2.8)

Source: llvm-defaults Version: 0.4 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629755: binutils-z80: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: binutils-source (< 2.21.1) but 2.21.52.20110606-1 is to be installed

Source: binutils-z80 Version: 2.21.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629754: libfso-glib: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: libfso-glib Version: 2010.05.11.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629753: libfsoframework: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: libfsoframework Version: 0.2.4+git20100501-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629752: binutils-msp430: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: binutils-source (= 2.21.51.20110523-1)

Source: binutils-msp430 Version: 2.21~msp20110421-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629750: asterisk-flite: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: asterisk-dev (< 1:1.6.3) but 1:1.8.4.2-1 is to be installed

Source: asterisk-flite Version: 0.1~beta2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌───

Bug#629751: fso-usaged: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: fso-usaged Version: 0.9.1.1+git20100507-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629749: eric: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python-sip-dev (< 4.11), python-qt4-dev (< 4.7.5)

Source: eric Version: 4.4.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629748: r-cran-pscl: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: r-cran-gam

Source: r-cran-pscl Version: 1.03.10-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629747: fso-abyss: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: fso-abyss Version: 0.9.0+git20100310-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629746: tango-icon-theme: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libmagick9-dev

Source: tango-icon-theme Version: 0.8.90-3 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629745: libcgi-application-plugin-tt-perl: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: perl-modules (< 5.12) but 5.12.3-7 is to be installed

Source: libcgi-application-plugin-tt-perl Version: 1.05-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629744: trac-bzr: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: bzr (< 2.4.0~beta1-2) but 2.4.0~beta3-2 is to be installed

Source: trac-bzr Version: 0.4.2+bzr117-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌──

Bug#629743: libwww-google-auth-clientlogin-perl: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: perl (>= 5.14) but 5.12.3-7 is to be installed

Source: libwww-google-auth-clientlogin-perl Version: 0.04-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: >

Bug#629742: gpsbabel: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: libqt4-dev (<= 4:4.7.0~beta1) but 4:4.7.3-1 is to be installed

Source: gpsbabel Version: 1.4.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629741: picprog: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libstdc++6-4.3-dev

Source: picprog Version: 1.9.0-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629740: lbdb: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvformat1-dev

Source: lbdb Version: 0.37 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629739: libgsm0710mux: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libvala-dev (>= 0.8.1)

Source: libgsm0710mux Version: 0.9.1+git20100322-2 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

Bug#629738: grub: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: gcc-4.3, gcc-4.3-multilib

Source: grub Version: 0.97-65 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌─

Bug#629737: ganeti-htools: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libghc6-parallel-dev (< 3)

Source: ganeti-htools Version: 0.3.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > ┌

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >