Bug#639850: gimp-gap version 2.6.0+dfsg-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6

Package: gimp-gap Version: 2.6.0+dfsg-1 Severity: important Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu oneiric ubuntu-patch In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Update implicit-pointer-conversion.patch to include another missing

Bug#637688: [mercurial] unable to reproduce bug

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 14:12:17 -0400, Simon wrote: > >> On 2011-08-16 03:49, Javi Merino wrote: >> > Hi Chris, >> >> >> BTW in case this may help, I'm including the output of the following >> >> command: >> >> >> >> $ ls -ld /usr/lib/pyth

Bug#639848: libicu4j-java: Synopsis typo

Le 30/08/2011 21:36, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Vincent Blut wrote: > >> internalisation >> > This is the UK spelling (as an American, I agree with your spelling, > but "internalisation" is actually correct) > > Hooray Irony! > > Cheers, > Paul > > Ok

Bug#630031: Isn't it another sign of problems with D865GBF motherboards?

I found this bug, when I was looking for solution for my problem related to the newest kernels and a machine based on D865GBF motherboard. I was striked by the fact, that problem reported here occured in a machine with the same motherboard and the newest kernel. My problem (macine not starting

Bug#639748: chromium: please add a side pane for bookmarks (like the one in Galeon)

forwarded 639748 http://crbug.com/20785 tags 639748 + wontfix quit Francesco Poli wrote: > If this is how Chromium upstream developers deal with very popular > feature requests, I do not dare imagine how they deal with minority > ones. Yes, upstream responds much better to well explained patches

Bug#404497: stty reports bogus error.

Package: coreutils Version: 8.5-1 Followup-For: Bug #404497 Hi, Any news on this bug? I just have been hit by it and it tooks me time to understand what happens. Regards, Vincent -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),

Bug#639848: libicu4j-java: Synopsis typo

retitle 639848 Description uses inconsistent English-es kthxbye On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Vincent Blut wrote: > Le 30/08/2011 21:36, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : >> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Vincent Blut >> wrote: >> >>> internalisation >>> >> This is the UK spelling (as an Americ

Bug#639851: symbol lookup error _restgpr_28_x

Package: xulrunner-6.0 Version: 6.0-4 Severity: important Hi, I can't start xulrunner-6.0 anymore: % xulrunner-6.0 /usr/lib/xulrunner-6.0/xulrunner-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xulrunner-6.0/libxul.so: undefined symbol: _restgpr_28_x Version 6.0-2 worked fine. Bye, Jörg. -- System Info

Bug#639341: dh: cannot override binary-arch and binary-indep selectively

Yann Dirson wrote: > I tried things like: > > build-arch: > dh_auto_build -a > docbook-to-man debian/tulip.sgml > debian/tulip.1 You're not running dh_auto_configure which dh would normally run here. Why not just run "dh build-arch" in the build-arch target? -- see shy jo signatu

Bug#630031: Isn't it another sign of problems with D865GBF motherboards?

forwarded 630031 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38262 merge 631597 630031 quit wzab wrote: > I found this bug, when I was looking for solution for my problem related to > the newest kernels and a machine based on D865GBF motherboard. > I was striked by the fact, that problem reported

Bug#639828: FTBFS: POM 'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin' not found in repository

tag 639828 + pending thanks On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:41:11PM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > Package: access-modifier-checker > Version: 1.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > Your package fails to build from source: It is already fixed in git. -- Miguel Lan

Bug#639848: libicu4j-java: Synopsis typo

Le 30/08/2011 21:49, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : > retitle 639848 Description uses inconsistent English-es > kthxbye > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Vincent Blut wrote: > >> Le 30/08/2011 21:36, Paul Tagliamonte a �crit : >> >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Vincent Blut >>> wro

Bug#630730: linux-image-2.6.32: GSO IPv6 issues

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 01:10:25AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: > After talking with Ben on IRC, I've prepared and sent a -longterm tree > submission for the two commits. I'll update the bug report when I get a > reply. I just got a reply that the patches were accepted to the stable review queue

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable "kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534" from Postfix on ext4

Hi, On Fri 26-08-11 16:03:32, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: > Ping? > > Any more ideas for debugging this issue? Sorry for not getting to you earlier. > I can still trigger it on my VM snapshot very easily, so if you have anything > you think I should test I would be very happy to give it a shot.

Bug#632734: Isn't it another sign of problems with D865GBF motherboards?

I found this bug, when I was looking for solution for my problem related to the newest kernels and a machine based on D865GBF motherboard. I was striked by the fact, that problem reported here occured in a machine with the same motherboard and the newest kernel. My problem (machine not starting

Bug#639841: sudo: secure_path change needs a NEWS entry

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:46:54 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Alternatively the sudo package could include a new conffile file in > the package /etc/sudoers.d/00-secure_path or some such that includes > the new secure_path setting. Being a new file it would be installed > by default without dialog and

Bug#487201: MPL in common-licenses and convenience of packaging mozilla extensions

On 29/08/11 17:48, Russ Allbery wrote: > Jonathan Nieder writes: > >> Allowing debian/copyright to rely on files _other_ than the common >> licenses in base-files would be a larger and different change, so >> off-topic for this bug. Unless done carefully, I don't think it's a >> good idea. > >

Bug#585433: Sid also broken

dm4:~# aptitude install fglrx-driver The following NEW packages will be installed: fglrx-driver{b} The following packages are RECOMMENDED but will NOT be installed: fglrx-atieventsd fglrx-glx fglrx-glx-ia32 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 21.2

Bug#626808: pxe-e1000.bin missing on Debian

Not sure this has been fixed; any help appreciated. *root@phlefevx:/usr/src/linux-source-3.0.0* *# qemu -s -S -hda /dev/zero -kernel /home/pat/workspace/kbuild/3.0.0-1/vmlinux * *qemu: **pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile "pxe-e1000.bin"* *# ls -l /usr/share/qemu/pxe-e1000.bin * *lrwxr

Bug#632396: rsyslog: terminates instead of logging anything past starting up

Am 02.07.2011 03:40, schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Michael Biebl dixit: > >> Try "-n" > > That gives me (startup excluded): > > […] > 0340.178347252:c09df4c0: main Q:Reg/w0: worker IDLE, waiting for work. > 0346.258093052:c11df4c0: imuxsock calling select, active file > descriptors (max 3)

Bug#639841: sudo: secure_path change needs a NEWS entry

Bdale Garbee wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Alternatively the sudo package could include a new conffile file in > > the package /etc/sudoers.d/00-secure_path or some such that includes > > the new secure_path setting. Being a new file it would be installed > > by default without dialog and become

Bug#639853: openjdk-6-jre >= 6b23~pre8-2 breaks josm

Package: josm Version: 0.0.svn4064-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The latest version of openjdk-6-jre is multiarch aware, which means the path of the jre has changed. This breaks /usr/bin/josm: + set -e ++ readlink -n -f /etc/alternatives/java + ALTERNATIVE_JDK=/usr/li

Bug#624062: upstream fix seems to exist: claws-mail 3.7.10cvs11

Hi, just found this patch: http://www.colino.net/claws-mail/index.php?len=4&ver=3.7.10cvs11#3.7.10cvs11 > 2011-08-30 [colin]: 3.7.10cvs11 > * configure.ac > * src/common/ssl.c > Don't use deprecated functions for GnuTLS priorities. > Require GnuTLS 2.2 that is the first version with the

Bug#639854: mutt-patched: crash on startup

Package: mutt-patched Version: 1.5.21-4~bpo60+1 Severity: important Hi, today I installed mutt-patched from backports, and it segfaults on startup. After the crash, the terminal is not in a sane state (ie, no cursor is being displayed). Core was generated by `mutt'. Program terminated with sign

Bug#638147: rsyslog: lost microseconds in timestamps

tags 638147 + confirmed forwarded 638147 http://bugzilla.adiscon.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281 thanks Am 17.08.2011 07:45, schrieb Kenyon Ralph: > Package: rsyslog > Version: 5.8.3-1 > Severity: normal > > When I enable high-precision timestamps by commenting the line > > #$ActionFileDefaultTempla

Bug#604895: please add SNMP module output support for rsyslog

tags 604895 + wontfix thanks Am 21.02.2011 13:44, schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 25.11.2010 08:47, schrieb Raphaël 'SurcouF' Bordet: >> >> Can you add support for SNMP output module for rsyslog ? >> >> This support just need to add libsnmp-dev to build-deps and --enable-snmp >> options to configure

Bug#639855: snoopy: Some package history has been lost

Package: snoopy Version: 1.8.0-2 Severity: important It seems that during the handoff the new maintainer, something weird happened regarding the package's history. More specifically, debian/changelog lists version 1.8.0-1 with the previous changelog entry being 1.3-13. However, lenny included 1.3

Bug#639341: dh: cannot override binary-arch and binary-indep selectively

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:59:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Yann Dirson wrote: > > I tried things like: > > > > build-arch: > > dh_auto_build -a > > docbook-to-man debian/tulip.sgml > debian/tulip.1 > > You're not running dh_auto_configure which dh would normally run here. > > Why not j

Bug#639712: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#639712: elyxer: Croaks when I use --title with non-ascii characters

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: > Package: elyxer > Version: 1.2.2-1 > Severity: normal > > Hi! > > When I use the --title option together with non-ascii characters, > elyxer fails. I get the following error message: Reproduced, thanks! I will add a test case, t

Bug#639737: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia: Please update ABI compatibility and add abi 11 for video

On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:54:41 Eric Valette wrote: > On 08/30/2011 03:45 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 21:35:46 +0200, Eric Valette wrote: > >> Package: xserver-xorg-video-nvidia > >> Version: 285.03-1 > >> Severity: normal > >> > >> The new .11 xorg driver ABI has been

Bug#639856: xf86-video-glamo: please consider enabling armhf

Package: xf86-video-glamo Version: 0.0.0+20100630.git16af3c00-3 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, Please consider enabling armhf in debian/control file. diff -Nru xf86-video-glamo-0.0.0+20100630.git16af3c00/debian/changelog xf86-video-glamo-0.0.0+20100630.git16af3c00/debian/changelog --- x

Bug#639857: nvidia-cg-toolkit: Fails to install with libc6 (>= 2.13-17)

Package: nvidia-cg-toolkit Version: 2.1.0017.deb1+nmu3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Recently I noticed that with libc6 (>= 2.13-17), the amd64 version of this package fails to completely install with the following error: Installing NVIDIA Cg Toolkit components: Cg compiler, header files,

Bug#639858: xserver-xorg-video-tga: Please add armhf support in architecture list

Package: xserver-xorg-video-tga Version: 1:1.2.1-4+b1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, Please consider adding armhf to list of supported architectures in debian/control: Perhaps Architecture: any ? sparc, kfreebsd-amd64, sh4, ... seem to be missing diff -u xserver-xorg-video-tga-1.2.

Bug#638654: configure.in

I would appreciate it if you could write a patch for configure.in to check for the version. I've already put an ifdef around the code in question, but it'll still get a useless link. Thanks. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/ --

Bug#639815: libfile-slurp-perl: Newer upstream versions and sub-optimal debian/watch file

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:34:14 +0200, gregor herrmann writes: >I guess the releases went unnoticed because the watch file contains >an author-specific URL, and the maintainer seems to have changed. sorry for that; file-slurp has changed upstream a few times now and this time i missed it. watch file

Bug#639859: apt-build fails to build packages ; it conflicts with apt

Package: apt-build Version: 0.12.38 Severity: grave Tags: sid wheezy patch Justification: renders package unusable Trying to install a package with apt-build, for example: # apt-build install hello it fails with: >W: Failed to fetch >file:/var/cache/apt-build/repository/dists/apt-build/Release U

Bug#639712: [Pkg-lyx-devel] Bug#639712: Bug#639712: elyxer: Croaks when I use --title with non-ascii characters

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Alex Fernandez wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen > wrote: >> Package: elyxer >> Version: 1.2.2-1 >> Severity: normal >> >> Hi! >> >> When I use the --title option together with non-ascii characters, >> elyxer fails. I get the fol

Bug#639860: open-vm-tools: vmware-toolbox and vmware-user binaries are missing

Package: open-vm-tools Version: 2:8.4.2+2011.08.21-471295-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable The new open-vm-tools package omits, ironically, the vmware tools. Specifically, at the very least, /usr/bin/vmware-toolbox /usr/bin/vmware-user are missing. Without the ability

Bug#615998: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64: Repeatable "kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:534" from Postfix on ext4

On Aug 30, 2011, at 18:12, Jan Kara wrote: > On Fri 26-08-11 16:03:32, Moffett, Kyle D wrote: >> Ping? >> >> Any more ideas for debugging this issue? > > Sorry for not getting to you earlier. That's ok, I have a workaround so it's been on my back burner for a while. >> I can still trigger it on

Bug#639856: [pkg-fso-maint] Bug#639856: xf86-video-glamo: please consider enabling armhf

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:45:01AM +0200, Hector wrote: > Package: xf86-video-glamo > [...] > Please consider enabling armhf in debian/control file. Hi Hector, Do you know any armv7 system, which uses the glamo? I only know of two devices having a glamo graphic chip: Openmoko GTA01 and Openmoko G

Bug#639861: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: no backlight control for NV34 (GeForce 5200) on PPC

Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1+b1 Severity: normal There is no control of the backlight with the nouveau drivers on a 12" Aluminium G4 PowerBook (PPC). /sys/class/backlight/ is empty. I believe this is why hibernation using the kernel's built-in facili

Bug#608512: icedove-3.0.11: Error getting mail password.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, As the problem still persists with the newest version of thunderbird (icedove 3.1.12-1) I searched again for a solution to finally unpin the icedove package. The migration assistant incorrectly replaced my username with an empty string as it c

Bug#638932: [Evolution] Bug#638932: evolution: Folder sent doesn't missing.

It's NOT a bug, I SOLVED it with the following command: mkdir /home/mohsen/.local/share/evolution/mail/local/send On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2011-08-24 at 15:38 +0430, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote: >> From my own email account : moh...@pahlevanzadeh.org.

Bug#639862: Patch to build using c++0x

Package: libboost-mpi1.46-dev Version: 1.46.1-7 Severity: normal File: boost Tags: upstream - Forwarded message from Christophe Prud'homme - Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:51:40 +0200 From: Christophe Prud'homme To: pkg-boost-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: [pkg-boost-devel] Fwd: misc

Bug#592085: debsums: excessive cpu use after update of package(s) via aptitude

Ryan Niebur wrote, on 31/08/11 05:22: Hi Arthur, On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 11:08:52PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote: Package: debsums Version: 2.0.48+nmu1 Severity: normal After updating a single small package (subnetcalc) on this machine with aptitude, debsums consumed 3 minutes of cpu time. Su

Bug#487201: MPL in common-licenses and convenience of packaging mozilla extensions

Ximin Luo writes: > On 29/08/11 17:48, Russ Allbery wrote: >> The project decided to say that our packages are intended for use on a >> Debian system with the essential Debian packages installed and hence >> not duplicate licenses that are in base-files, which I think is a bit >> of a hand-wave,

Bug#639824: ibus: new upstream version 1.3.99.20110817

Hi, Harshula Thanks. I will handle it this weekend. -- Best Regards, Asias He -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#635321: Unable to reproduce with soundtouch 1.6.0-1 or 1.6.0-2

Hello: Today I tried to reproduce this bug but I could not do it. I also could not find a change in soundtouch BPM routines from 1.5.0 to 1.6.0 that could have caused it. Here is a log of what I did but I cut out some of the verbose: $ apt-cache policy libsoundtouch0 | grep Installed Installed

Bug#639863: shotwell: new upstream version (0.11.0) available

Package: shotwell Version: 0.10.1-1 Severity: wishlist Hi. There is a new upstream version of shotwell available that contains some good-to-have fixes. It would be nice to have it available, even in experimental. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable

Bug#193061: adopting lgeneral?

Hi, You mentioned you were planning to adopt lgeneral after squeeze's release and squeeze has been out for a couple of months now. I was just curious about the status of this. Thanks, Drew Daniels http://www.boxheap.net/ddaniels/blog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@l

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:48:11 Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > What I can't tell for sure from the documentation is whether OpenSSL > > > and GnuTLS do check the CRL's v

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:08:29 Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > On lun., 2011-08-29 at 20:24 -0

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:26:26AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:48:11PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 01:0

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:48:49PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Fast forward four months... > > On Sam, 2011-04-30 at 20:04 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:00:41PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:17:15PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote: > > > >

Bug#639830: mdadm: alternative md-device names

Can you add 'set -x' to the top of the hook, remake the initramfs, and put it somewhere for me to download (or ftp://ftp.madduck.net/incoming)? Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://peop

Bug#639864: ITP: libpoe-component-syndicator-perl -- POE component base class which implements the Observer pattern

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Jotam Jr. Trejo" * Package name: libpoe-component-syndicator-perl Version : 0.06 Upstream Author : Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Syndicator/ * License : (GPL, Artistic) Progr

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:35:09AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Interestingly, according to bug #639851, 6.0-2 didn't have the problem. > Which suggests something else broke. Actually, it must have worked by luck in 6.0-2 for that user, because the binary is affected the same way. So, it would be

Bug#639744: Compromised certificates for *.google.com issued by DigiNotar Root CA

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:49:04PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 15:48:11 Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:58:18PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > On mar., 2011-08-30 at 12:29 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > > What I can't tell for sure from

Bug#639771: fritzing: FTBFS: src/partsbinpalette/graphicsflowlayout.cpp:83:63: error: no matching function for call to 'qMax(double&, qreal)'

Hi, I added old patch. I add new patch to this mail. Best regards, Nobuhiro 2011/8/30 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu : > Source: fritzing > Version: 0.6.3b-2 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: debian-...@superh.org > Usertags: sh4 > Justification: FTBFS > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag

Bug#639865: auditd: new upstream release available

Package: auditd Version: 1.7.18-1 Severity: normal http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/ The above URL has release 2.1.3. Among other things it uses /proc/self/oom_score_adj which stops recent kernels from whinging. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable AP

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:05:04AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:35:09AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Interestingly, according to bug #639851, 6.0-2 didn't have the problem. > > Which suggests something else broke. > > Actually, it must have worked by luck in 6.0-2 for th

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:26:10AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:05:04AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:35:09AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Interestingly, according to bug #639851, 6.0-2 didn't have the problem. > > > Which suggests something e

Bug#632920: Related to 605268

Presumably this is related to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605268 in OpenOffice.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#639341: dh: cannot override binary-arch and binary-indep selectively

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:59:21PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Yann Dirson wrote: > > I tried things like: > > > > build-arch: > > dh_auto_build -a > > docbook-to-man debian/tulip.sgml > debian/tulip.1 > > You're not running dh_auto_configure which dh would normally run here. > > Why not j

Bug#626808: pxe-e1000.bin missing on Debian

On 31.08.2011 02:27, Patrick Lefevre wrote: > Not sure this has been fixed; any help appreciated. > > /root@phlefevx :/usr/src/linux-source-3.0.0/ > > /# qemu -s -S -hda /dev/zero -kernel > /home/pat/workspace/kbuild/3.0.0-1/vmlinux / > > /qemu: //pci_add_option_rom: faile

Bug#639837: UI hangs for 30s while loading pages

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:53:47AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2011 22:32:31 Mike Hommey wrote: > > How big is the ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/sessionstore.js file ? > > > uli@fruitbox:~$ ll ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/sessionstore.js > -rw--- 1 uli uli 305k Aug 30 21:43 > /home/

Bug#639837: UI hangs for 30s while loading pages

On Tuesday 30 August 2011 22:32:31 Mike Hommey wrote: > How big is the ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/sessionstore.js file ? uli@fruitbox:~$ ll ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/sessionstore.js -rw--- 1 uli uli 305k Aug 30 21:43 /home/uli/.mozilla/firefox/xzqx6a0f.default/sessionstore.js 305k on one line .. is

Bug#589515: already fixed

close 589515 thanks This bug was fixed in 2.0.46-1 (which wasn't uploaded to Debian) and in 2.1.0-1. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

On Mit, 2011-08-31 at 07:35 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:26:10AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:05:04AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:35:09AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Interestingly, according to bug #639851,

Bug#610685: offlineimap: I think I've found where the problem is: the file encodings.

Package: offlineimap Version: 6.3.4-1 Severity: normal Hi again, I wanted to ask if I need to avoid some email encoding in my maildir. I'm now getting the error: -- Copy message -191 Maildir[Babel] -> G

Bug#624354: Processed: Re: Bug#624354: ./xpcshell: error while loading shared libraries: ./libxul.so: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0f9f0148 for symbol `_restgpr_29_x' out of range

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:39:05AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mit, 2011-08-31 at 07:35 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:26:10AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:05:04AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:35:09AM +020

Bug#639861: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: no backlight control for NV34 (GeForce 5200) on PPC

reassign 639861 linux-2.6 3.0.0-1 kthxbye On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:58:59 +0100, cfr wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau > Version: 1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1+b1 > Severity: normal > > > There is no control of the backlight with the nouveau drivers on a 12" > Aluminium G4 PowerBoo

Bug#639744: Accepted ca-certificates 20110502+nmu1 (source all)

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Changes: > ca-certificates (20110502+nmu1) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team. >* Blacklist "DigiNotar Root CA" (Closes: #639744) Are we updating stable too? Cheers, weasel --

<    1   2   3   4