Hi,
I'm quite sure I did sponsor this package once.
So I looked in it, in order to sponsor again. But it's not in SID.
What happened to it? Why it's not in SID anymore?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Am 14.08.2012 08:13, schrieb Thomas Goirand:
Hi,
I'm quite sure I did sponsor this package once.
So I looked in it, in order to sponsor again. But it's not in SID.
What happened to it? Why it's not in SID anymore?
Thomas
Rejected?
Why didn't you closed the bug then? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Mark Lodato loda...@gmail.com wrote:
I have this same problem. Packages randomly appear as manually
installed. This annoys me so much that I have set up a script to
monitor this.
For the record: Packages listed in this file are marked as auto-installed
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
As said before [0], I would like #644392 to get fixed and thus asked
paultag to do an upload to tpu since I don't have my gpg key around. I
also asked him to do an upload to unstable to fix the same bug. This
way, some additional testing will be made
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2012-08-14 02:20, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package bundler
This package displays its usage information using 'less'. On systems
without
Package: libarpack++2-dev
Version: 2.3-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
i encountered some build errors when compiling a template function with gcc-4.7.
Best,
Jan
--- a/include/ardssym.h
+++ b/include/ardssym.h
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
{
this-NoShift();
- DefineParameters(A.ncols(), nevp, A,
Source: libqtgui4
Severity: normal
When enabling multiarch support installing new packages of qt with two 64 and
32 bit versions not possible. It happens becase
/usr/share/doc/libqtgui4/changelog.Debian.gz file is in 64 bit and 32 bit
versions, so while installing one package after other gets
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:36 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
I double-checked. Debian's syncevo-dbus-server does use GIO D-Bus; what
I saw must have been an indirect call to libdbus (happens later, via
gvfs).
I think I got the same
issue with 1.2.99.4 (can't really check as I'm on vacation).
On 2012-08-13 21:29, Ralf Jung wrote:
currently, doing sudo aptitude install libgl1-nvidia-glx on a new system
pulls in loads of unwanted stuff: Namely, the rt flavour of the linux kernel
is
the -rt- prebuilt modules will go away as the ABI is not considered
stable (and would require a
Hi Andreas,
to some extend by chance I stumbled upon bug #674226 and I'm a bit
unsure how to proceed. My wording by chance is that I was poking in
the list of Debian RC bugs to speed up the release a bit in general to
shorten the release cycle and enable the Debian Med team to do some even
more
[dropping the mailing list]
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:20:27AM -0500, Jaime Frey wrote:
I like the idea of allowing the use of an existing 'condor' account
that we can reasonably verify can't be logged into. I presume the
packaging would have to remember that it didn't create the account, so
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:18:11PM +0200, Tiziano Zito wrote:
What about this in condor.postinst::
SH=$(getent passwd | egrep '^condor:'| cut -d : -f 7)
if [ $SH = /bin/false -o $SH = /usr/sbin/nologin ]; then
# condor user exists and it is a locked user
else
adduser --system ...
I forgot the debdiffs. Here they are.
Best regards.
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-02-10 16:05:38.0 -0500
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-08-13 20:22:02.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,21
Package: gpsbabel
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
When I use gpsbabel to convert the geotag in the exif data of a photo taken
below sea level, gpsbabel will
give a warning message: exif: Invalid GPSAltitudeRef (1)! Using 0 (= Sea
level). and the altitude in
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 09:18:36AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:18:11PM +0200, Tiziano Zito wrote:
What about this in condor.postinst::
SH=$(getent passwd | egrep '^condor:'| cut -d : -f 7)
if [ $SH = /bin/false -o $SH = /usr/sbin/nologin ]; then
# condor
Have you tried the options --arch=arm, --subarch=armel? Based on how I
got things working elsewhere, I suspect this combination of options
*might* get the desired result.
If so, this surprises me a bit, since you can use --arch=amd64, rather
than --arch=x86 --subarch=amd64.
--
Source: mapserver
Version: 6.0.1-3.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc-4.6
Source: voms-api-java
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: rgl
Version: 0.92.798-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -I/usr
Source: qmf
Version: 1.0.7~2011w23.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -c
Source: fparser
Version: 4.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash
Source: spatialite
Version: 3.0.0~beta20110817-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant
Source: numexpr
Version: 2.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: jenkins-instance-identity
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant
Source: scilab-overload
Version: 1.3.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: scilab-scimax
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: lilypond
Version: 2.14.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[6
Source: wireless-regdb
Version: 2011.04.28-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: linaro-image-tools
Version: 2012.06-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: python-concurrent.futures
Version: 2.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant
Source: r-cran-pscl
Version: 1.03.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: apr
Version: 1.4.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: elfutils
Version: 0.152-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc
Source: jenkins
Version: 1.447.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: obfsproxy
Version: 0.1.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2
Source: backbone
Version: 0.5.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: jenkins-ssh-cli-auth
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: radare
Version: 1:1.5.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: pyside
Version: 1.1.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: joblib
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: argyll
Version: 1.4.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in wheezy, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I
Source: scim-tables
Version: 0.5.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
g
Source: nautilus-image-manipulator
Version: 1.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant
Source: installation-guide
Version: 20110122
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gst-buzztard
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin
Source: pynn
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: scim-prime
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64
Source: bsnes
Version: 0.088-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in wheezy, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -std=gnu++0x -o out
Source: php-config
Version: 1.10.12-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: krusader
Version: 1:2.3.0~beta1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: wagon2
Version: 2.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: wine-gecko-1.4
Version: 1.4+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: torcs
Version: 1.3.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3
Source: sslh
Version: 1.13b-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: tcsh
Version: 6.18.01-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -o tcsh
Source: jscoverage
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc
Source: sugar-hulahop
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: python-eventlet
Version: 0.9.16-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: scim-canna
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64
Source: svnkit
Version: 1.3.5+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
Source: scim-chewing
Version: 0.3.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin
Source: fusioninventory-agent
Version: 2.2.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120814 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: norsp
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
examples/query.hssp contains the following header:
AVAILABLE Free academic use. Commercial users must apply for license.
AVAILABLE No inclusion in other databanks without permission.
It violates DFSG #6 at least, the second paragraph could also
Source: profphd
Version: 1.0.38-1
Severity: serious
several files under src/prof/exa contains the following header:
AVAILABLE Free academic use. Commercial users must apply for license.
AVAILABLE No inclusion in other databanks without permission.
It violates DFSG #6 at least, the second
Hi,
on a D-E squeeze diskless workstation I figured out a workaround that
allows users to unmount mobile HDs / USB flash drives. It probably
will help to eject optical discs as well, though this has not been
tested, yet. (Will be happy about feedback).
However, I am not sure if we can
On 11/08/12 15:00, Nicholas J Humfrey wrote:
Please can you add support for setting of the httpListenAddress
option in Jekins, using the /etc/default/jenkins configuration
file.
This will allow binding to localhost (or other alternative IP) and
then use another webserver (such as Apache) as
Charles,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
Le Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:27:33AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
Question: Can any other webservers use mod_php? If so, they _might_ be
vulnerable, as the supplied Apache config snippet probably
On 07/08/12 17:39, Eugen Dedu wrote:
On 15/07/12 02:10, Barry deFreese wrote:
Package: ptlib
Version: 2.10.4~dfsg-1
Severity: important
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Tags: patch
Hi,
Currently ptlib fails to build on Debian GNU/Hurd.
Attached is a patch for building on
Package: debian-edu-config
Version: 1.454~svn77318
Severity: normal
Hi all,
on some occasions (30-60% of the system reboots) the startup of autofs
fails. This is due to a race condition between network-manager
bringing up eth0 (in most cases) and the need of autofs to access LDAP
for
Hi Petter, hi all,
with this script, the CUPS failures on Debian Edu machines (not only
diskless) are gone:
$ cat /etc/network/if-up.d/cups
#!/bin/sh
if [ -x /etc/init.d/cups ]; then
/etc/init.d/cups restart
fi
I drop this script into any Debian Edu machine and the issues is
On 07/08/12 17:39, Eugen Dedu wrote:
On 15/07/12 02:10, Barry deFreese wrote:
Package: ptlib
Version: 2.10.4~dfsg-1
Severity: important
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Tags: patch
Hi,
Currently ptlib fails to build on Debian GNU/Hurd.
Attached is a patch for building on
* Bart Martens ba...@debian.org [120813 23:14]:
The information in debian/copyright is not yet complete, see for
example the file src/egg/eggcolumnmodel.c.
Hello Bart,
Thanks for the hint. I understand that the copyright situation
should be clarified.
Do you imply that even with the fix for
Hi lachlan,
I think there is nothing we can do for you within the 4.x release stream.
With the upcoming 5.x background jobs have been introduced and stuff
like scanning media files will be done on cron jobs.
Take care,
Thomas
Am Dienstag, dem 14.08.2012 um 7:25 schrieb lachlan:
Package:
On 14 August 2012 14:40, David Kalnischkies
kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel, maybe it has something to do with apt/apt-pkg/depcache.cc 1034ff.
I think so, and also the dancing aptitude does to track and restore
auto-installed when it thinks apt might be silly. Aptitude shouldn't
Package: debian-edu-config
Version: 1.454~svn77318
Severity: minor
The script
/usr/share/debian-edu-config/tools/pxe-addfirmware
in debian-edu-config depends on the executable ,,ar'' (in package binutils).
However, binutils does not get install on a main server only
installation profile.
Dear,
This is Song from Shenzhen WTS Co.,Ltd which is an OEM manufacturer. We
specialized in 3g modem and router .
Our products including:
1. 3.5G/3G WCDMA/ EVDO/ HSUPA/ HSDPA/ wireless USB modem
2. 2G/3G wifi/MINI router（it could used for Mobile power，Transmission and
Reading memory）
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 01:46:11PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
- - I've added myself as uploader (I am DM and not DD), Stu, can you
please verify that this is OK?
I'm happy with this.
Stu
--
From the prompt of Stu Teasdale
Why won't you let me kiss you goodnight? Is it something I said?
Package: apt-xapian-index
Version: 0.45
Severity: important
The problem statement is this:
rrs@champaran:/var/tmp/Debian-Build/build$ apt-cache search
linux-image-3.5
linux-headers-3.5-trunk-amd64 - Header files for Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64
linux-image-3.5-trunk-amd64 - Linux 3.5 for 64-bit PCs
Package: conntrackd
Version: 1:1.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Triying to start conntrackd in daemon mode result on this:
[Thu Aug 9 14:14:23 2012] (pid=3819) [notice] -- starting in daemon mode --
[Thu Aug 9 14:14:23 2012] (pid=3819) [ERROR] no
Please see attached patch, which removes one more remaining line which
references partman-crypto-loop.
--
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
From 564b5fe5f461d4cc5ca5f2ddf1569e690b777aed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrijs.ledk...@canonical.com
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:11:08 +0100
Subject:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Martin Pitt mp...@debian.org wrote:
Hello Magnus,
Magnus Hagander [2012-07-04 9:16 +0200]:
I took the liberty to forward this to the Debian bug tracker, so it's
now tracked in
Thanks,
Looks like the best bet for this is to wait for 5. i haven't found any
decent ways to find any log information in 4.0.x.
122: Filename substitution FAILED (subst.at:57)
| configure:4142: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-z,relro conftest.c 5
|
On Mo, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:53:58 (CEST), Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
Package: amtterm
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: wishlist
The amtterm package would greatly benefit from
including the amttool-tng utility - or if it could
be packaged separately, it might be a better option.
amttool-tng is a fork
diff --git a/debian/condor.postinst b/debian/condor.postinst
index 91ac8a5..0156b7c 100755
--- a/debian/condor.postinst
+++ b/debian/condor.postinst
@@ -164,8 +164,24 @@ case $1 in
configure)
# according to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621833#119
On Dienstag, 14. August 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
The script
/usr/share/debian-edu-config/tools/pxe-addfirmware
is that executed on every install? else a recommends should be fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
On Dienstag, 14. August 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
on some occasions (30-60% of the system reboots) the startup of autofs
fails.
thats on squeeze or wheezy?
This script fixes the issue, it can be placed on any Debian Edu machine:
$ cat /etc/network/if-up.d/autofs
#!/bin/sh
if [ -x
reassign 684863 libnfnetlink0
thanks
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Arturo Borrero wrote:
Package: conntrackd
Version: 1:1.2.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Triying to start conntrackd in daemon mode result on this:
[Thu Aug 9 14:14:23 2012]
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello installer maintainers,
would it be possible to add acl option to mount options during installation?
It should trigger installation of acl package, if present.
With regards,
Libor
- -- System
tags 684807 patch
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I have a attached a patch to support altitudes below sea level in exif
tags with gpsbabel.
Kind regards,
Arnold Metselaar
Handle GPS tags indicating photo was taken below sea level
--- a/gpsbabel/exif.c~ 2012-05-16 21:23:12.0 +0200
+++
Package: live-build
Version: 3.0~a57-1
Severity: normal
lb_binary_syslinux has this piece of code:
# This is all rather suboptimal.. needs prettifying at some point
_FLAVOURS=$(echo ${LB_LINUX_FLAVOURS} | wc -w)
case ${_FLAVOURS} in
1)
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.13-3.2
Severity: normal
quote from expr(1) info file:
When built with support for the GNU MP library, `expr' uses
arbitrary-precision arithmetic; otherwise, it uses native arithmetic
types and may fail due to arithmetic overflow.
This appears to
On Tue, 2012-08-14 at 09:07 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLOCALEDIR='/usr/share/locale' -I.
-I.. -I. -I. -I../lib -I.. -I./../libelf -std=gnu99 -Wall
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your mail and the explanations. We are currently working on
untangling the patches, but it's pretty nontrivial. I hope we'll have a
better patch ready later today. The current commit was just to test if the
current version of BALL would compile on testing at all (which
Source: qt4-x11
Version: 4:4.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
qt4-x11 4:4.8.2-2 was binNMU'd to solve #684177, but this is causing issues of
its own for multiarch users, and will presumably need a sourceful upload.
Jon
tail from today's 'apt-get dist-upgrade':
Preparing to
Hi,
I burned the weekly testing images (last modified 13-Aug-2012):
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ia64/iso-cd/debian-testing-ia64-CD-1.iso
and
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/ia64/iso-dvd/debian-testing-ia64-DVD-1.iso
I could boot them; the El-Torito headers
This bug is against conntrackd where the problem resides in libnfnetlink,
therefore I'll reassign this bug. Also this bug does not affect everybody so
it is possible to argue if it is really grave, but I'll leave it now as it
is.
Ok, i'm quite noob reporting bugs, i'm sorry.
It probably to
tags 681645 fixed-upstream
thanks
I committed them:
http://opalvoip.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opalvoip?view=revisionrevision=28199
http://opalvoip.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/opalvoip?view=revisionrevision=28200
It remains the question on OSS.
On 15/07/12 02:10, Barry deFreese wrote:
Package:
Package: conntrackd
Version: 1:1.2.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
It seems that version 1.2.1 of Conntrackd has a bug in a commit operation.
In the next version tag (1.2.2) the issue is fixed.
The exact upstream commit is:
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your quick response. Just let me know if I could be of any
help.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:38:41AM +, Hildebrandt, Prof. Dr. Andreas wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for your mail and the explanations. We are currently working on
1 - 100 of 356 matches
Mail list logo
